cool! so there shouldn't be any API changes at this point? just bug fixes?
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Marius marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
Awesome !
On Jan 10, 9:01 am, Jorge Ortiz jorge.or...@gmail.com wrote:
I've made two Git branches which compile Lift against Scala
Jorge,
Have you done any stress tests to make sure that the Actors memory leak
thing is fixed? If not, I'll work some up on Monday.
Thanks,
David
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Jorge Ortiz jorge.or...@gmail.com wrote:
I've made two Git branches which compile Lift against Scala
I've used Fogbugz, Bugzilla and Mantis for a while now.
The one complaint I have for all of them is that they're ugly. Ugly
like the devil's face.
All of them let you save filters/queries so I can easily hit All
Regressions by Tyler and see how I'm holding up the product from
shipping.
I would
Mmm swampland .. reminds me of Shrek !
Personally I prefer it to be a very simple tool for people to open
Lift defects, to allow flexible queries to generate statistics (Flot
widget could reused here), attachments, ability to link defects as
defects may depends on other defects etc. ... oh and
This is fabulous news that you guys are almost at the first release
candidate for 1.0. Is there any estimate as when 1.0 will be released
and is there any roadmap?
I had a look at the book that is in progress and it looks very
promising.
Good work chaps.
Cheers,
Alfred
On Jan 10, 2:50 pm,
I have a new Lift site online -- still fine tuning the look in IE --
here, if anyone is interested:
http://tinibigs.com/
This one (as is true with pretty much all my sites) is a sort of
mini-CMS. The client can log in and change almost anything on the site
(except the look feel). This
Came across this page as I was looking around for hibernate in scala
stuff. About the best list of features I've ever seen. Pretty much my
list (though I have a few more items). Wondering what has been
implemented and what hasn't...
