[Lift] More hibernate/lift insanity

I have a site that runs fine on my local machine using jetty:run. I load it into a Jetty instance on the server, and I get the error below. Same code, same page. Same servlet container. What's more, several other sites use basically the same code. Anybody got any clue? It's not finding somethi

[Lift] Re: thanks

On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 05:43, Oliver wrote: > > If you could that would be great! > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Jorge Ortiz > wrote: > > > > One of the projects I keep putting off is to extract Lift's templating > > system into a component that could be used as a stand-alone library. If

[Lift] Re: Code Freeze

For the 0.11 release, the scaladoc wil be generated with vscaladoc 1.2 (not released yet) vscaladoc support some feature that could help you : * code fragment, to insert sample in the doc * the tag @codeAsDoc that copy the code as documentation, usefull for single line code, multi-signature, synoni

[Lift] Re: Code Freeze

Kris, Anything that does not change code is fine. Thanks, David On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Kris Nuttycombe wrote: > I presume that I'm still okay to commit all of the scaladoc updates I've > been working on? I'll probably have all of lift-utils (with the exception > of the parser combina

[Lift] Re: thanks

If you could that would be great! On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Jorge Ortiz wrote: > > One of the projects I keep putting off is to extract Lift's templating > system into a component that could be used as a stand-alone library. If this > is something you'd be interested in, let me know and

[Lift] Re: Code Freeze

I presume that I'm still okay to commit all of the scaladoc updates I've been working on? I'll probably have all of lift-utils (with the exception of the parser combinator stuff which I don't understand) fully documented either tonight or tomorrow morning, with lift-webkit soon to follow. Kris O

[Lift] Code Freeze

Folks, The code for Lift 0.11-SNAPSHOT (aka, Lift 1.0 RC) is frozen. The only changes to the Lift codebase between now and 2/26, the 1.0 release date, will be bug fixes. Please test, test, test, test, test the 0.11-SNAPSHOT release. I checked in some browser compatibility fixes today (making IE8

[Lift] Re: [ANN] New specs release: 1.4.3

Awesome! Thanks. On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:07 PM, etorreborre wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like to announce a new specs release, 1.4.3. > > This release fixes the following issues: > > -issue 50: subexamples reporting > -issue 51, 53: "behave like" is not working > -issue 55: beIn, notBeIn restric

[Lift] Re: thanks

On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Oliver wrote: > > Thanks for all the help and support over the last few months. During > that time, I've developed several > Lift applications that are now successfully running in production at > the company I work for. > > One of the things that has impressed me

[Lift] Re: Problems with lift:gc attributes

I just pushed up some fixes for ie8. Please let me know if they work. On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Charles F. Munat wrote: > > I don't know if this is related, but my Lift pages do not display in IE8 > unless I click the "broken page" button. A run through the HTML > validator produces the

[Lift] Re: thanks

Oliver, On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Oliver wrote: > > Thanks for all the help and support over the last few months. During > that time, I've developed several > Lift applications that are now successfully running in production at > the company I work for. > Awesome. > > One of the things

[Lift] thanks

Thanks for all the help and support over the last few months. During that time, I've developed several Lift applications that are now successfully running in production at the company I work for. One of the things that has impressed me is the community spirit of the group. I've had pretty much a

[Lift] Re: lift jetty configuration question

Good to know. David Pollak wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Charles F. Munat > wrote: > > > Is this true for Google Chrome, too? (Probably, although each tab is a > wholly separate process, I hear.) > > > They share cookies between the processes

[Lift] Re: IMPORTANT: Library Upgrades

Damn Jorge, nice stuff. Comprehensive. On Feb 12, 1:50 pm, Jorge Ortiz wrote: > I've upgraded the dependencies for all of the Lift components and sample > projects. I used the latest backward-compatible version that was available > on public Maven repositories. (See below for the complete list.

[Lift] Re: IMPORTANT: Library Upgrades

Awesome stuff. On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Jorge Ortiz wrote: > Ok, two more upgrades. Do note that Blueprint changed it's directory > layout. If you're using the snippet you should be fine > though. > > Blueprint CSS > 0.6 -> 0.8 > > YUI > 2.5.1 -> 2.6.0 > > --j > > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009

[Lift] Re: Problems with lift:gc attributes

Folks, After some digging, it appears that the lift:gc problem is a jQuery and/or Firefox issue. jQuery BlockUI creates a that contains the dialog. For some reason, that does not seem to get the namespace attributes of the current document (I don't know if this is a jQuery problem in that the n

[Lift] Re: IMPORTANT: Library Upgrades

Ok, two more upgrades. Do note that Blueprint changed it's directory layout. If you're using the snippet you should be fine though. Blueprint CSS 0.6 -> 0.8 YUI 2.5.1 -> 2.6.0 --j On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Jorge Ortiz wrote: > You're right, I completely forgot about Blueprint and YUI

[Lift] Re: lift jetty configuration question

On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Charles F. Munat wrote: > > Is this true for Google Chrome, too? (Probably, although each tab is a > wholly separate process, I hear.) > They share cookies between the processes unless you're browsing "Incognito." > > Chas. > > David Pollak wrote: > > > > > >

[Lift] Re: lift jetty configuration question

Is this true for Google Chrome, too? (Probably, although each tab is a wholly separate process, I hear.) Chas. David Pollak wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Meredith Gregory > mailto:lgreg.mered...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > David, > > This is merely demoware -- nothing de

[Lift] Re: Problems with lift:gc attributes

I don't know if this is related, but my Lift pages do not display in IE8 unless I click the "broken page" button. A run through the HTML validator produces the following: Line 42, Column 62: there is no attribute "lift:gc". …ber" name="F743081847476BRR" lift:gc="F743081847476BRR" type="text"

[Lift] Re: new JDBC support in lift-mapper

Hey Al, Im afraid not - now I get this on boot: java.lang.NullPointerException at net.liftweb.mapper.Schemifier$$anonfun$8.quad$1 (Schemifier.scala:233) at net.liftweb.mapper.Schemifier$$anonfun$8.apply (Schemifier.scala:237) at net.liftweb.mapper.Schemifier$$anonfun$8.ap

[Lift] Re: IMPORTANT: Library Upgrades

I thought their had been a cull of all IE5 users? ;-) On Feb 12, 7:58 pm, Jorge Ortiz wrote: > Although it seems like the latest version of Blueprint still has issues with > Opera, IE 6, and IE 5.5 (!!!). > See:http://wiki.github.com/joshuaclayton/blueprint-css/browser-compatibil... --~--~

[Lift] Re: IMPORTANT: Library Upgrades

You're right, I completely forgot about Blueprint and YUI. I'll get those right away. Although it seems like the latest version of Blueprint still has issues with Opera, IE 6, and IE 5.5 (!!!). See: http://wiki.github.com/joshuaclayton/blueprint-css/browser-compatibility-list --j On Thu, Feb 12,

[Lift] Re: IMPORTANT: Library Upgrades

Basically 1.3.x is bringing a new selector engine to the table, plus some new cool features like live-events and some performance-tweaks with html() etc. But the release-docs are all up on the nice looking jquery.com site :) So basically the selector-stuff will be faster in the general app. :) The

[Lift] Re: IMPORTANT: Library Upgrades

Oh by the way, the Jquery update bring speed improvements im guessing - has anyone tested / tried the comet stuff with 1.31? Just wondering if we'll see any noticeable speed improvement? Cheers Tim --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are su

[Lift] Re: IMPORTANT: Library Upgrades

Jesus! You have been busy Jorge! Kudos my good man :-) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, sen

[Lift] Re: IMPORTANT: Library Upgrades

On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Joachim A. wrote: > > Jorge, > thanks a lot for that (I especially like the JQuery 1.3.1 update). Yeah, jQuery 1.31 is an awesome upgrade. Love working with it :-) > > > Is it possible to update to the latest blueprint css version? 0.8 was > released > 2009-02

[Lift] Re: basic lift question

import js._ import JsCmds._ SHtml.a(() => {Alert("Hi Greg")}, Text("Create an activity")) SHtml.a(() => {SetHtml("here", Hi Greg)}, Text("Create an activity")) SetHtml can put something on the page, no matter how complex that something is. For example, you could replace Hi Greg with: { me

[Lift] Re: IMPORTANT: Library Upgrades

Jorge, thanks a lot for that (I especially like the JQuery 1.3.1 update). Is it possible to update to the latest blueprint css version? 0.8 was released 2009-02-06. I noticed some type/font problem in Opera with the version shipped with Lift. Joachim > I've upgraded the dependencies for all o

[Lift] Re: basic lift question

David, Thanks for your on-going support! From the looks of your example, i'm guessing that if i want to subsequently call some JavaScript to provide visual feedback of the server-side behavior i do something more interesting than the " js.JsCmds.Noop" in your code. However, i can't see exactly wha

[Lift] IMPORTANT: Library Upgrades

I've upgraded the dependencies for all of the Lift components and sample projects. I used the latest backward-compatible version that was available on public Maven repositories. (See below for the complete list.) PLEASE CHECK YOUR APPS to make sure nothing breaks. You only have a couple of weeks to

[Lift] Re: lift jetty configuration question

Tim, That's a great idea. That's exactly what i want to do. Now, we're back to my initial report. Whoops! i must have used Firefox for both localhost requests before. If i use FF and Safari i get the behavior i wanted. Nevermind. ;-( Best wishes, --greg On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Tim Perr

[Lift] Re: Problems with lift:gc attributes

Joachim, I've found and fixed the "key" problem. The Namespace problem looks like a Firefox bug. I'm still working through it. Thanks, David On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Joachim A. wrote: > > Hi, > I'm using the jQuery plugin ModalDialog in a page. The message which is > displayed in a

[Lift] Re: lift jetty configuration question

On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Meredith Gregory wrote: > David, > > This is merely demoware -- nothing deployable. i simply need the following > behavior > >- get http://localhost:8080 provides a login page (always) >- login sets up the session so that subsequent req's of the form >h

[Lift] Re: lift jetty configuration question

This might be a stupid suggestion, but cant you just use two different browsers to be logged in with two users at the same time? Im guessing you want to demo some kind of comet behavior or similar between two users? Tim On Feb 12, 5:25 pm, Meredith Gregory wrote: > David, > > This is merely de

[Lift] Re: lift jetty configuration question

David, This is merely demoware -- nothing deployable. i simply need the following behavior - get http://localhost:8080 provides a login page (always) - login sets up the session so that subsequent req's of the form http://localhost:8080/mumble-with-session-info provide access to that

[Lift] Re: basic lift question

On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Meredith Gregory wrote: > Lifted, > > Suppose i've got the following fragment of lift tags > > > > > > > href="#" title="Add an activity" align="right">+ Create an activity > > > ... > > > and i want the onclick to call into a lift snippet inst

[Lift] Re: lift jetty configuration question

Greg, If each HTTP request to localhost had a new session, what would happen when you log in? If you can tell me a little more about your use case, I'll work on a solution. Thanks, David On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Meredith Gregory wrote: > Tim, > > Essentially, i want every request for

[Lift] Re: lift jetty configuration question

Tim, Essentially, i want every request for http://localhost:8080 to start up a new session. This should force login each time. Best wishes, --greg On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 3:30 AM, Tim Perrett wrote: > > Can you clarify what you mean by "instance"? You mean run jetty on > another TCP port othe

[Lift] basic lift question

Lifted, Suppose i've got the following fragment of lift tags + Create an activity ... and i want the onclick to call into a lift snippet instead of my jQuery function, AddWidget, as it does above. How would i rewrite the anchor tag? Best wishes, --greg -- L.G. Meredith Man

[Lift] Re: new JDBC support in lift-mapper

The defaultSchemaName fix for the SqlServerDriver is checked in. Please let me know if that fixes the startup stacktrace you were seeing. On Feb 12, 6:48 am, "alm4x1...@gmail.com" wrote: > I have some patches to Schemifier that were not ready by the 1.0 > freeze. > > I tracked this problem down

[Lift] Re: new JDBC support in lift-mapper

I have some patches to Schemifier that were not ready by the 1.0 freeze. I tracked this problem down to line 122 of Schemifier.scala: using(md.getTables(null, getDefaultSchemaName(connection), null, null)){ rs => But an ifdef is obviously not what we want here. I think I should have put th

[Lift] Re: confusion about lift-archetype-version versus lift version

Tim, David, Thanks! Best wishes, --greg On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 5:33 AM, Tim Perrett wrote: > > Sorry my bad - I should have pointed that out. > > On Feb 12, 12:31 pm, David Bernard wrote: > > 0.11 isn't released the correct version number is 0.11-SNAPSHOT > > > > -- L.G. Meredith Managin

[Lift] Re: confusion about lift-archetype-version versus lift version

Sorry my bad - I should have pointed that out. On Feb 12, 12:31 pm, David Bernard wrote: > 0.11 isn't released the correct version number is 0.11-SNAPSHOT --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" grou

[Lift] javax transactions

I deployed an app to a Jetty instance on my server and suddenly started having problems with javax.transactions. I have the following in my pom: org.hibernate hibernate-entitymanager 3.3.1.ga javax.transaction jta And this has always worked in the pa

[Lift] Re: confusion about lift-archetype-version versus lift version

0.11 isn't released the correct version number is 0.11-SNAPSHOT On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:35, Tim Perrett wrote: > > 0.10 is the current RELEASE that can be found in the > http://scala-tools.org/repo-releases > repo. > > 0.11 is the current DEV that can be found in > http://scala-tools.org/repo

[Lift] Re: confusion about lift-archetype-version versus lift version

0.10 is the current RELEASE that can be found in the http://scala-tools.org/repo-releases repo. 0.11 is the current DEV that can be found in http://scala-tools.org/repo-snapshots If you want to use 0.11, then you need to change your shell script to this: #! /bin/sh mvn archetype:generate -U

[Lift] Re: lift jetty configuration question

Can you clarify what you mean by "instance"? You mean run jetty on another TCP port other than 8080? And by other browser do you mean two seperate apps (like firefox and safari) or just two seperate windows in the same app? Cheers Tim On Feb 12, 2:27 am, Meredith Gregory wrote: > Lifted, > >

[Lift] Re: new JDBC support in lift-mapper

Just found a bug with the MSSQL drivers... Looks like its all working fine, but on boot I see this with the schemifier: Like I say, it works (the app that is) but having this stack trace on boot is not nice. Any ideas? INFO - CREATE TABLE modifiers (name VARCHAR(100) , id BIGINT IDENTITY NOT NUL