Do you see any errors in the server console/logs? ... Do you have the
XHTML markup that browser gets?
Br's,
Marius
On May 24, 4:40 am, KaniniPazham mohan.narayanasw...@credit-
suisse.com wrote:
I guess my previous post didn't reach.
I have tried enough to my lift knowledge, but need someone's
I'm wondering maybe it would be good to abstract the actors in Lift
such that when Scala Actors are in a better shape we could just switch
the implementation back to Scala Actors with very little Lift code
changes.
Br's,
Marius
On May 24, 2:26 am, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
+1 Marius sounds like a good idea. Hopefully this will also
minimize the impact on user code when we switch back to the EPFL
reference implementation.
Thanks, Tim
On May 24, 9:46 am, marius d. marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm wondering maybe it would be good to abstract the actors in
Doh, this is due to the .gitignore file has exluded it (its not in the
git repo).
Derek has the sources for this, so he'll need to add it specifically.
Cheers, Tim
On May 23, 11:41 pm, Charles F. Munat c...@munat.com wrote:
Another weird thing about the JPA blank archetype: there is an
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 12:45 AM, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen je...@ingolfs.dk wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen je...@ingolfs.dk wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 4:52 PM, David Pollak
feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
Getting the secondary menu items:
def
I'm working on a LiftView implementation and have noticed that views
and snippets, despite being very similar, are structured differently.
Could these be unified?
Snippet: Any class in a snippets package is a snippet. Classes that
extend DispatchSnippet use a dispatch PF while others are
Is this error in the browser? Look for a 'snippet not found' error in the
log
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 9:40 PM, KaniniPazham
mohan.narayanasw...@credit-suisse.com wrote:
I guess my previous post didn't reach.
I have tried enough to my lift knowledge, but need someone's help.
error on line
I fixed it.
Here is the following lesson i learnt.
1. Check the console log, it gives the clue.
2. package and folder structure - are not related (I am from Java
background)
in my case, my folder was com/nikias/vina/snippet, but my package
was com.nikias.vina.model
Mohan
On May 24, 2:00 am,
2.7.4 and 1.1-SNAPSHOT
David Pollak wrote:
What version of Scala is in your pom.xml file and what version of Lift?
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Charles F. Munat c...@munat.com
mailto:c...@munat.com wrote:
Here is more detail on this error:
2009-05-23 15:41:20.856::INFO:
What runtime are you using (java -version)?
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Charles F. Munat c...@munat.com wrote:
2.7.4 and 1.1-SNAPSHOT
David Pollak wrote:
What version of Scala is in your pom.xml file and what version of Lift?
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Charles F. Munat
Please use 1.1-SNAPSHOT. It's got much better in the browser error
reporting when you're running in development mode.
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 2:51 AM, KaniniPazham
mohan.narayanasw...@credit-suisse.com wrote:
I fixed it.
Here is the following lesson i learnt.
1. Check the console log, it
Willis,
Thank you for your thoughtful analysis of this aspect of Lift. I find
myself disagreeing with your assessments and suggestions and at an
emontional level, I'm really sad about disagreeing with you. However, I do
have a lot of respect for your willingness to make the suggestions and the
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 1:46 AM, marius d. marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm wondering maybe it would be good to abstract the actors in Lift
such that when Scala Actors are in a better shape we could just switch
the implementation back to Scala Actors with very little Lift code
changes.
I
java version 1.5.0_16
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_16-b06-284)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_16-133, mixed mode, sharing)
David Pollak wrote:
What runtime are you using (java -version)?
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Charles F. Munat
David,
You may have thought that I was suggesting a grander unification than
I was.
I don't think that views and snippets should be unified into a single
concept. They serve different purposes. I was just noticing that
there are reflective vs. dispatch variants of both but that the
framework
David,
By the way, your use case for views is the same as mine: I am using
the path to look up a node in my CMS and then returning a template
based on the type of node.
W
On May 24, 1:30 pm, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
Willis,
Thank you for your thoughtful analysis
For the record, no one from the EPFL or otherwise affiliated with it has
responded to issue #2009.
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 1:56 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 1:46 AM, marius d. marius.dan...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm wondering maybe it would be
From all your notes it seems that EPFL is reluctant to correct these
problems (at least not soon enough)... which I can't seam to
understand why since Scala Actors have always been a strong factor of
attracting people to Scala even if actors are not part of the language
per se, but a library.
18 matches
Mail list logo
