I don't know how to grab git fingerprint, but I can modify the pom.xml
to add a timestamp in the Manifest
Implementation-Version${project.version}-${buildNumber}/Implementation-Version
Are you ok ?
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 18:26, David
Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed,
Hi,
Thanks for u r quick reply.
Now I am explain my problem in details :
I have normal form with one text box and one submit button.
Also i have 2 table components(these are dynamic tables )..but these
table are out of the from tag.These table only displays information.
Flow of the
Hey all,
I guess im mainly asking this to DPP, as the wizard is his baby, but
have you (or do you) intend to make more progress on this soon? Its
something that interests me a great deal and i'd like to discuss /
help out if possible.
Cheers, Tim
in case it helps anyone else, here is the solution to the above
problem
the dirty_? function should (obviously) use || not
override def dirty_?(toCheck: User): Boolean =
Address.dirty_?(toCheck.getAddress) || super.dirty_?(toCheck)
it appears i have been suffering from a severe bout of
Maven is still quite git unfriendly, unfortunately.
We used to have BuildNumber plugin (http://mojo.codehaus.org/
buildnumber-maven-plugin/create-mojo.html) in a Subversion based
project.
I don't think that works for Maven's Git SCM provider though.
Alternately, this plugin allows injecting
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Grant Wood smackt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
Here is the output you wanted:
-- Begin output
[INFO] Starting jetty 6.1.19 ...
2009-08-20 20:34:08.780::INFO: jetty-6.1.19
2009-08-20 20:34:08.908::INFO: No
I still don't understand.
Does the user do anything to get the faster table updated or do you want the
faster table pushed from the server when something changes on the server?
If it's the former (the user does something to get the faster table
updated), you want to use ajaxButton... the user
It gets even better. I put together some code to determine driver behavior
and it seems to work. The problem is that now I'm testing against PG 8.0,
which I just found out doesn't support the lastval() function :(. This
begs the question, can we document somewhere what versions of the databases
I hate talking over myself, but it seems like I could kill two birds with
one stone by uzing the index names to fire off currval calls instead. That
would fix this for all PG server 8.0-8.1 and it would also solve the problem
of retrieving values when there is more than one generated key.
Derek
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.comwrote:
It gets even better. I put together some code to determine driver behavior
and it seems to work. The problem is that now I'm testing against PG 8.0,
which I just found out doesn't support the lastval() function :(.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri
indraj...@gmail.comwrote:
Maven is still quite git unfriendly, unfortunately.
We used to have BuildNumber plugin (http://mojo.codehaus.org/
Naftoli,
I must be doing something wrong. I tried the following, as you
suggested,
inserting the extra xml after the item:fields tag, but
ManagerUsers.list does its
own iteration through the table items and I get duplicate columns.
ManageUsers.list just does a bind to the myuser:roles tag.
Perhaps its worth going to market (as it were) to check that there is either
no single solution, nor a number of other solutions (mojos) that we could
string together to get what we want? Im not sure that the effort involved in
making our own is warranted given the output...
Perhaps someone in
OK, this is pushed into 1.1-SNAPSHOT and 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:50 AM, David Pollak
feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Derek Chen-Becker
dchenbec...@gmail.comwrote:
It gets even better. I put together some code to determine driver
I don't know that it did. Let me look into it.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:34 AM, David Pollak
feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Grant Wood smackt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
Here is the output you wanted:
It didn't. As soon as I get the PostgreSql patch pushed for 1.1-0SNAPSHOT
I'll work on getting the DateTime fix into 1.0.1
Derek
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.comwrote:
I don't know that it did. Let me look into it.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:34 AM,
Kevin,
The way I implemented asmselect for a MappedManyToMany object was to
write a method in my Mapper class to extract the information
from the database.
object roles
extends MappedManyToMany(UserRole, UserRole.user, UserRole.role,
Role)
def validSelectValues: Box[List[(Long,
I should have thought of that problem.
I could make TableEditor more flexible when I have time, but the truth is that
I don't know if it's worth it. The whole thing is less than 80 LOC with
scaladocs (not counting the utilities it uses which you can also use). The real
logic that provides its
Naftoli,
I think a configurable TableEditor is a good thing to have. I don't
believe it would take much to enhance what you have started. For one
thing, if TableEditorImpl were not a protected class, then
one could simply override what is needed. Perhaps it should be made a
trait that users
OK, the patch is in 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT. Grant, can you test against
1.0.1-SNAPSHOT and make sure that it works for you?
Thanks,
Derek
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.comwrote:
It didn't. As soon as I get the PostgreSql patch pushed for 1.1-0SNAPSHOT
I'll work
Hi all,
I think I have a problem with my pom.xml file, as when I run 'mvn
install' I get an error saying that Lift Core is missing. 'mvn
jetty:run' works fine. My pom.xml is here: http://gist.github.com/172540
I'd appreciate any tips. Thanks!
Peter Robinett
Hello Derek,
I can confirm that 1.01-SNAPSHOT fixes the problem. Here is output
from my test instance from earlier.
--- Begin
[INFO] Starting jetty 6.1.19 ...
2009-08-21 19:40:16.410::INFO: jetty-6.1.19
2009-08-21 19:40:16.526::INFO: No Transaction manager
It should be very safe to use 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT. I'm planning on spinning the
release of 1.0.1 GA next Wednesday, so we're in a code freeze starting
Sunday. Really, the 1.0 line is strictly bug-fix at this point (1.1-SNAPSHOT
is where new features make it in). So far, the things that have made it
23 matches
Mail list logo
