[Lift] Record-aware secondary menu?

2009-05-09 Thread Clemens Oertel
, Clemens --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com

[Lift] Re: Is Lift the right tool for us?

2009-04-21 Thread Clemens Oertel
concerns when switching from mapper to JPA or similar. I will be switching to JPA in the next two weeks. Best, Clemens --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email

[Lift] Re: (created|updated|deleted)_(by|at) trait

2009-04-10 Thread Clemens Oertel
[OwnerType] { self: OwnerType = // A lot more stuff here ... } Best, Clemens --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com

[Lift] Re: Rails - Lift

2009-04-09 Thread Clemens Oertel
IDE (the causality goes both ways). It's always a matter of needs, prior experience, taste ... Best, Clemens On 9-Apr-09, at 5:38 AM, Alexander Kellett wrote: actually my biggest blocker (and still my blocker) is getting a working coding environment. there is so much contradictory

[Lift] Good way to implement cancel links?

2009-04-04 Thread Clemens Oertel
, and populate it using the linking page's URI: SHtml.link(editUrl, () = {...; cancelLinkRV(S.request.uri)}, Text(Edit)) Is the URI really reusable like this? Or is there already some better way provided by lift? Thanks, Clemens --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received

[Lift] Re: Forms validation formatter

2009-04-02 Thread Clemens Oertel
the mapper class (or it's companion object) fill out the forms itself. I'd be happy if someone could prove me wrong ... Best, Clemens PS: Exercise for the reader: Instead of selective linking, have only either A or B be displayed, depending on the embedding context. On 31-Mar-09, at 3:59 PM

[Lift] Re: Forms validation formatter

2009-03-31 Thread Clemens Oertel
fantastic. Thank you for listening/reading, Clemens On 19-Mar-09, at 1:08 PM, marius d. wrote: On Mar 18, 11:24 pm, Clemens clemens.oer...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you for your patience, Marius. Well you can use different RecordMeta implementations if you need to different representation

[Lift] Re: Forms validation formatter

2009-03-31 Thread Clemens Oertel
Marius: On 31-Mar-09, at 12:31 PM, marius d. wrote: On Mar 31, 5:06 pm, Clemens Oertel clemens.oer...@gmail.com wrote: - Why not provide the same template mechanism used for forms for HTML output? This way I can reuse the same template for both - given that my records have at least

[Lift] MappedDateTime - Do we have a Date? Or is it a timestamp?

2009-03-31 Thread Clemens Oertel
, Clemens --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com

[Lift] Re: Forms validation formatter

2009-03-18 Thread Clemens Oertel
are to be displayed as 3 radio buttons. One of course wants to ensure that such a change only affects one area in the code base. That's what got me wondering: Is the toForm approach the best one for my case? Thanks for listening, Clemens On 18-Mar-09, at 3:18 AM, marius d. wrote: FWIW please also take

[Lift] Re: Forms validation formatter

2009-03-18 Thread Clemens
there is still some level of validation in mappers but I haven't played with it yet ... Oh, the validation is working just fine with mapper. It's only the lack of flexibility with respect to automated output that's I'm talking about. Best, Clemens --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You

[Lift] Re: Forms validation formatter

2009-03-18 Thread Clemens
something has changed. But I could also call toForm(formRenderer) for non-default rendering. it's quire a paradigm shift from ... say MVC mindset. But let's not get into a patterns debate now .. we had plenty of those :) Agreed. Best, Clemens

[Lift] lift:snippet type=Foo.bar != lift:Foo.bar?

2009-03-17 Thread Clemens
? Thanks in advance! Best, Clemens --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb

[Lift] Re: lift:snippet type=Foo.bar != lift:Foo.bar?

2009-03-17 Thread Clemens
. On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Clemens clemens.oer...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everybody, I'm fairly new to lift (and to scala, to be honest), and just trying to find my way around. So far I like what I'm seeing and deing, but some things keep me puzzled. Short version of my confusion

[Lift] Forms validation formatter

2009-03-17 Thread Clemens Oertel
classes, is better? Many options ... I'm looking forward to any feedback. Best, Clemens --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com

[Lift] Forms validation formatter

2009-03-17 Thread Clemens
. inputTypeCallback (inputFormatter)) ... Maybe a partial function, potentially on case classes, is better? Many options ... I'm looking forward to any feedback. Best, Clemens --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google