[Lift] Re: Can or Box or something else

2008-12-30 Thread Michael Campbell

Josh Suereth wrote:
 In the spirit of LOLCode, I make the following proposal:

It's ok to love LOLCode, etc just don't *LOVE* LOLCode.

-- 
Twitter:  http://twitter.com/campbellmichael

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Lift] Re: Can or Box or something else

2008-12-25 Thread Michael Campbell

David Pollak wrote:
 Folks,
 
 Over the year that Lift has had Can[T] as a replacement for Scala's 
 Option[T], the name Can has required a lot of explaining.


I've never liked Can as a name; always thinking that the opposite of one 
should be a Can't.   I'm sure it's my own issue to solve, but it's 
cognitively dissonant to me.

Any other container name works better for me, although of the ones you listed, 
I like Box.


-- 
Twitter:  http://twitter.com/campbellmichael

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---