[Lift] Re: [scala-internals] RC8 candidate for the first 2.8.0 beta

2010-01-21 Thread martin odersky
(Un)fortunately I have an idea what the problem is. It's probably my fix for #2867. I have now rolled back that fix in r20629. Can you check again whether it works with that revision (should be in the nightly tomorrow)? If it does we might be able to make an exception to our RC = final rule,

[Lift] Re: [scala-internals] RC8 candidate for the first 2.8.0 beta

2010-01-21 Thread martin odersky
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 8:31 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: I've written a work-around and am currently testing the code more in a few minutes. If you can make it work, so much the better. To give some info: The original ticket had a vararg parameter of the form

[Lift] Re: [scala-internals] RC8 candidate for the first 2.8.0 beta

2010-01-21 Thread martin odersky
, 2010 at 11:36 AM, martin odersky martin.oder...@epfl.ch wrote: On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 8:31 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: I've written a work-around and am currently testing the code more in a few minutes. If you can make it work, so much the better. To give

[Lift] Re: [scala-internals] RC5 candidate for the first 2.8.0 beta

2009-12-22 Thread martin odersky
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Josh Suereth joshua.suer...@gmail.com wrote: I think staying in maven would require the least amount of typing, but the most amount of time as you'd have to publish local snapshots of Scala 2.8.0 to use them in the lift build.  I remember how annoying this is

[Lift] Re: [scala-internals] RC5 candidate for the first 2.8.0 beta

2009-12-22 Thread martin odersky
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Josh Suereth joshua.suer...@gmail.com wrote: For curiousities sake, if you're building using fsc, are you running scalac via an exploded classpath (i.e. not a JAR file?).  If so, I'll try to come up with a longer-term solution for this. Yes, exactly. My usual

[Lift] Re: [scala-internals] RC5 candidate for the first 2.8.0 beta

2009-12-22 Thread martin odersky
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Heiko Seeberger heiko.seeber...@googlemail.com wrote: Martin, OK, now I got it working (almost) without Maven: 1. step: Check out 280_port branch from ...@github.com:dpp/liftweb.git 2. step: cd into liftweb/lift-persistence/lift-mapper and run mvn

Re: [Lift] Re: [scala-internals] RC5 candidate for the first 2.8.0 beta

2009-12-22 Thread martin odersky
Thanks for all the help. I tried to do mvn clean mvn install After upgrading to maven 2.2.1, I got somewhere. It compiled a bunch of packages including lift-mapper, so it seems it did not in fact take RC6 as its compiler? But then it stopped due to a build error here. Any idea what I need to

Re: [Lift] Re: [scala-internals] RC5 candidate for the first 2.8.0 beta

2009-12-22 Thread martin odersky
I just verified that it did indeed use 2.7.7, because the generated classfiles still have version 4.1. My new strategy is to build with the last working RC3, and then recompile just the failing file with the current compiler and all lift classes on the classpath. That should work. But I need to

Re: [Lift] Re: [scala-internals] RC5 candidate for the first 2.8.0 beta

2009-12-22 Thread martin odersky
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.com wrote: Martin, I think the jetty version is incorrect in the pom.xml in test:sample. It should be:        groupIdorg.mortbay.jetty/groupId        artifactIdjetty/artifactId        version[6.1.6,7.0)/version See

Re: [Lift] Re: [scala-internals] RC5 candidate for the first 2.8.0 beta

2009-12-22 Thread martin odersky
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.com wrote: Martin, I think the jetty version is incorrect in the pom.xml in test:sample. It should be:        groupIdorg.mortbay.jetty/groupId        artifactIdjetty/artifactId        version[6.1.6,7.0)/version ...

Re: [Lift] Re: [scala-internals] RC5 candidate for the first 2.8.0 beta

2009-12-22 Thread martin odersky
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.com wrote: On 22/12/09 10:44 PM, martin odersky wrote: On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.com  wrote: Martin, I think the jetty version is incorrect in the pom.xml in test:sample

Re: [Lift] Re: [scala-internals] RC5 candidate for the first 2.8.0 beta

2009-12-22 Thread martin odersky
I found someone who could download the repository with git. So trying again now. -- Martin On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:36 PM, martin odersky martin.oder...@epfl.ch wrote: On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.com wrote: On 22/12/09 10:44 PM, martin odersky

Re: [Lift] Re: [scala-internals] RC5 candidate for the first 2.8.0 beta

2009-12-22 Thread martin odersky
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:48 PM, martin odersky martin.oder...@epfl.ch wrote: I found someone who could download the repository with git. So trying again now. ... and it builds with RC3. Great! So now I have something to work with ... Cheers -- Martin -- You received this message because

Re: [Lift] Re: [scala-internals] RC5 candidate for the first 2.8.0 beta

2009-12-22 Thread martin odersky
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Paul Phillips pa...@improving.org wrote: On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 05:45:52PM +0100, martin odersky wrote: But I need to know how to build lift with a 2.8.0 compiler. Or alternatively, if a kind soul can send me a lift 2.8.0 tarball with all the classfiles

[Lift] Re: [scala-internals] RC4 candidate for the first 2.8.0 beta

2009-12-21 Thread martin odersky
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 12:39 PM, martin odersky martin.oder...@epfl.ch wrote: Thanks for letting us know. This looks like something stirred up by the change in erasure. We'll investigate Monday what it is. Cheers  -- Martin I could reproduce the fault and think I found the underlying

[Lift] Re: [scala-internals] RC4 candidate for the first 2.8.0 beta

2009-12-20 Thread martin odersky
Thanks for letting us know. This looks like something stirred up by the change in erasure. We'll investigate Monday what it is. Cheers -- Martin On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Heiko Seeberger heiko.seeber...@googlemail.com wrote: Lift built against RC3, but with RC4 we get this error: