(Un)fortunately I have an idea what the problem is. It's probably my
fix for #2867. I have now rolled back that fix in r20629. Can you
check again whether it works with that revision (should be in the
nightly tomorrow)? If it does we might be able to make an exception to
our RC = final rule,
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 8:31 PM, David Pollak
feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
I've written a work-around and am currently testing the code more in a
few minutes.
If you can make it work, so much the better. To give some info: The
original ticket had a vararg parameter of the form
, 2010 at 11:36 AM, martin odersky martin.oder...@epfl.ch
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 8:31 PM, David Pollak
feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
I've written a work-around and am currently testing the code more in
a
few minutes.
If you can make it work, so much the better. To give
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Josh Suereth joshua.suer...@gmail.com wrote:
I think staying in maven would require the least amount of typing, but the
most amount of time as you'd have to publish local snapshots of Scala 2.8.0
to use them in the lift build. I remember how annoying this is
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Josh Suereth joshua.suer...@gmail.com wrote:
For curiousities sake, if you're building using fsc, are you running scalac
via an exploded classpath (i.e. not a JAR file?). If so, I'll try to come
up with a longer-term solution for this.
Yes, exactly. My usual
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Heiko Seeberger
heiko.seeber...@googlemail.com wrote:
Martin,
OK, now I got it working (almost) without Maven:
1. step:
Check out 280_port branch from ...@github.com:dpp/liftweb.git
2. step:
cd into liftweb/lift-persistence/lift-mapper and run
mvn
Thanks for all the help. I tried to do
mvn clean
mvn install
After upgrading to maven 2.2.1, I got somewhere. It compiled a bunch
of packages including lift-mapper, so it seems it did not in fact take
RC6 as its compiler?
But then it stopped due to a build error here.
Any idea what I need to
I just verified that it did indeed use 2.7.7, because the generated
classfiles still have version 4.1.
My new strategy is to build with the last working RC3, and then
recompile just the failing file with the current compiler and all lift
classes on the classpath. That should work.
But I need to
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri
indraj...@gmail.com wrote:
Martin,
I think the jetty version is incorrect in the pom.xml in test:sample.
It should be:
groupIdorg.mortbay.jetty/groupId
artifactIdjetty/artifactId
version[6.1.6,7.0)/version
See
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri
indraj...@gmail.com wrote:
Martin,
I think the jetty version is incorrect in the pom.xml in test:sample.
It should be:
groupIdorg.mortbay.jetty/groupId
artifactIdjetty/artifactId
version[6.1.6,7.0)/version
...
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri
indraj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22/12/09 10:44 PM, martin odersky wrote:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri
indraj...@gmail.com wrote:
Martin,
I think the jetty version is incorrect in the pom.xml in test:sample
I found someone who could download the repository with git. So trying
again now.
-- Martin
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:36 PM, martin odersky martin.oder...@epfl.ch wrote:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri
indraj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22/12/09 10:44 PM, martin odersky
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Paul Phillips pa...@improving.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 05:45:52PM +0100, martin odersky wrote:
But I need to know how to build lift with a 2.8.0 compiler. Or
alternatively, if a kind soul can send me a lift 2.8.0 tarball with
all the classfiles
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 12:39 PM, martin odersky martin.oder...@epfl.ch wrote:
Thanks for letting us know. This looks like something stirred up by
the change in erasure. We'll investigate Monday what it is.
Cheers
-- Martin
I could reproduce the fault and think I found the underlying
Thanks for letting us know. This looks like something stirred up by
the change in erasure. We'll investigate Monday what it is.
Cheers
-- Martin
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Heiko Seeberger
heiko.seeber...@googlemail.com wrote:
Lift built against RC3, but with RC4 we get this error:
15 matches
Mail list logo
