[Lift] Re: Rails - Lift

2009-04-10 Thread Alexander Kellett

well, fwiw :P i eventually chose ideavim with intellij. best of both worlds.
thanks all for the input!

On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:20 PM, TylerWeir tyler.w...@gmail.com wrote:

 It's not an editor/IDE war unless someone brings up Vim or Emacs,
 so...

 I've been using Vim+Scala+Ctags since I started.

 I'd recommend not getting hung-up on which editor is the best  just
 start coding.


 On Apr 9, 3:01 pm, Charles F. Munat c...@munat.com wrote:
 I was thinking that I'd start with Textmate, since I've used that the
 most and it's what most Rails developers use, and then move to NetBeans,
 since that seems to be pretty popular. But I could take a quick look at
 Eclipse, too.



 David Pollak wrote:

  On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Alexander Kellett lypa...@gmail.com
  mailto:lypa...@gmail.com wrote:

      actually my biggest blocker (and still my blocker) is getting a
      working coding environment.

      there is so much contradictory information on which ide is the best.
      it would be really nice to have a document that talks about the pro's
      and con's of each ide.

      in the rails/osx world its easy: use textmate unless you have a
      predisposition for something else.

  I spent a lot of time coding Scala and Lift with emacs and Textmate.
   They work fine.

  While my current IDE of choice is NetBeans, I'm not convinced that an
  IDE is better than a good text editor.

      not the case for lift / scala in general.

      i know, boring... but i think it really would help to have such a
      document to help people decide.

      On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Charles F. Munat c...@munat.com
      mailto:c...@munat.com wrote:

        I'm writing a proposal for a presentation on moving from Rails to
      Lift.

        A couple of stumbling blocks that I've mentioned are:

        1. Understanding and taking advantage of immutable constructs.

        2. Getting the hang of the view-centric approach to MVC.

        Before I go much further, I'd like to poll this list for things that
        others think should be included. For former or current Rails
      developers
        like myself, What sorts of things gave you the most trouble when
      moving
        to Lift (or trying it out)? What would you like to have had someone
        explain to you to make the transition easier?

        Thanks for any help!

        Chas.

  --
  Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net
  Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
  Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp
  Git some:http://github.com/dpp
 


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Lift] Re: Rails - Lift

2009-04-10 Thread Timothy Perrett

I think a lot of people coming to scala from ruby are more familiar
with the terminal and textmate style combination... using large IDE's
with boat loads of features is more for people coming from a
traditional java background. Thats not to say they don't have merit,
of course they do, but I think they wouldn't add a lot of value to
people who arnt used to using an IDE full stop and possibly dont see
why they should use one.

Having gone Java - Ruby - Scala, I started off being an eclipse guy
but after coding in ruby for a few years just didnt want to step back
into eclipse or netbeans: neither felt right

Cheers, Tim

On Apr 9, 8:01 pm, Charles F. Munat c...@munat.com wrote:
 I was thinking that I'd start with Textmate, since I've used that the
 most and it's what most Rails developers use, and then move to NetBeans,
 since that seems to be pretty popular. But I could take a quick look at
 Eclipse, too.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Lift] Re: Rails - Lift

2009-04-10 Thread David Pollak
I think this thread points out something important about Lift... what
matters most is what works for you.  There are plenty of people on this list
that use one editor or another... use mapper or JPA... use lots of
comet/ajax or use very little.  The only thing that's right is what works
for you... and if you do something different than everyone, please share...
I expect we'll learn something.

Thanks,

David

On Apr 9, 2009 1:20 PM, TylerWeir tyler.w...@gmail.com wrote:


It's not an editor/IDE war unless someone brings up Vim or Emacs,
so...

I've been using Vim+Scala+Ctags since I started.

I'd recommend not getting hung-up on which editor is the best  just
start coding.

On Apr 9, 3:01 pm, Charles F. Munat c...@munat.com wrote:  I was
thinking that I'd start with...

  On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Alexander Kellett lypa...@gmail.com  
mailto:lypa...@gmail.c...
  On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Charles F. Munat c...@munat.com

  mailto:c...@munat.com wrote:  I'm writing a proposal
for a presentation on mo...
  Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890

  Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp   Git 
  some:http://github.com/dpp--~--~-~--~~...

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Lift] Re: Rails - Lift

2009-04-10 Thread Ben Diola

Does anyone know how to get a console in netbeans that I can run mvn
scala:cc?


On Apr 10, 8:12 am, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
 I think this thread points out something important about Lift... what
 matters most is what works for you.  There are plenty of people on this list
 that use one editor or another... use mapper or JPA... use lots of
 comet/ajax or use very little.  The only thing that's right is what works
 for you... and if you do something different than everyone, please share...
 I expect we'll learn something.

 Thanks,

 David

 On Apr 9, 2009 1:20 PM, TylerWeir tyler.w...@gmail.com wrote:

 It's not an editor/IDE war unless someone brings up Vim or Emacs,
 so...

 I've been using Vim+Scala+Ctags since I started.

 I'd recommend not getting hung-up on which editor is the best  just
 start coding.

 On Apr 9, 3:01 pm, Charles F. Munat c...@munat.com wrote:  I was
 thinking that I'd start with...

   On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Alexander Kellett lypa...@gmail.com  

 mailto:lypa...@gmail.c...

       On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Charles F. Munat c...@munat.com
       mailto:c...@munat.com wrote:      I'm writing a proposal

 for a presentation on mo...

   Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
   Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp  Git 
   some:http://github.com/dpp--~--~-~--~~...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Lift] Re: Rails - Lift

2009-04-09 Thread Warren Henning

You're proposing to scrap working code?

Isn't that trying to fix something that isn't broken?

Warren

On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Charles F. Munat c...@munat.com wrote:
 I'm writing a proposal for a presentation on moving from Rails to Lift.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Lift] Re: Rails - Lift

2009-04-09 Thread Jacob Grydholt Jensen

No, he is talking about *developers* switching from rails to lift, not projects.

/grydholt

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Lift] Re: Rails - Lift

2009-04-09 Thread Charles F. Munat

Sorry, but I haven't got a clue what you're talking about.

Chas.

Warren Henning wrote:
 You're proposing to scrap working code?
 
 Isn't that trying to fix something that isn't broken?
 
 Warren
 
 On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Charles F. Munat c...@munat.com wrote:
 I'm writing a proposal for a presentation on moving from Rails to Lift.
 
  

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Lift] Re: Rails - Lift

2009-04-09 Thread Alexander Kellett

actually my biggest blocker (and still my blocker) is getting a
working coding environment.

there is so much contradictory information on which ide is the best.
it would be really nice to have a document that talks about the pro's
and con's of each ide.

in the rails/osx world its easy: use textmate unless you have a
predisposition for something else.

not the case for lift / scala in general.

i know, boring... but i think it really would help to have such a
document to help people decide.

On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Charles F. Munat c...@munat.com wrote:

 I'm writing a proposal for a presentation on moving from Rails to Lift.

 A couple of stumbling blocks that I've mentioned are:

 1. Understanding and taking advantage of immutable constructs.

 2. Getting the hang of the view-centric approach to MVC.

 Before I go much further, I'd like to poll this list for things that
 others think should be included. For former or current Rails developers
 like myself, What sorts of things gave you the most trouble when moving
 to Lift (or trying it out)? What would you like to have had someone
 explain to you to make the transition easier?

 Thanks for any help!

 Chas.

 


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Lift] Re: Rails - Lift

2009-04-09 Thread David Pollak
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Alexander Kellett lypa...@gmail.com wrote:


 actually my biggest blocker (and still my blocker) is getting a
 working coding environment.

 there is so much contradictory information on which ide is the best.
 it would be really nice to have a document that talks about the pro's
 and con's of each ide.

 in the rails/osx world its easy: use textmate unless you have a
 predisposition for something else.


I spent a lot of time coding Scala and Lift with emacs and Textmate.  They
work fine.

While my current IDE of choice is NetBeans, I'm not convinced that an IDE is
better than a good text editor.




 not the case for lift / scala in general.

 i know, boring... but i think it really would help to have such a
 document to help people decide.

 On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Charles F. Munat c...@munat.com wrote:
 
  I'm writing a proposal for a presentation on moving from Rails to Lift.
 
  A couple of stumbling blocks that I've mentioned are:
 
  1. Understanding and taking advantage of immutable constructs.
 
  2. Getting the hang of the view-centric approach to MVC.
 
  Before I go much further, I'd like to poll this list for things that
  others think should be included. For former or current Rails developers
  like myself, What sorts of things gave you the most trouble when moving
  to Lift (or trying it out)? What would you like to have had someone
  explain to you to make the transition easier?
 
  Thanks for any help!
 
  Chas.
 
  
 

 



-- 
Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
Git some: http://github.com/dpp

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Lift] Re: Rails - Lift

2009-04-09 Thread Timothy Perrett


On the contrary... Im coding in TextMate right now: it works perfect!

I run scala:cc in a terminal window and just code away in TextMate. Job
done.

Tim

On 09/04/2009 10:38, Alexander Kellett lypa...@gmail.com wrote:
 in the rails/osx world its easy: use textmate unless you have a
 predisposition for something else.
 
 not the case for lift / scala in general.
 
 i know, boring... but i think it really would help to have such a
 document to help people decide.



--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Lift] Re: Rails - Lift

2009-04-09 Thread Clemens Oertel

I don't think it's necessary to make a final decision about your IDE  
at any time. AFAIK, all major IDEs work quite well with Maven's pom  
files, so it's very easy to switch IDEs at any time.

I for instance used NetBeans until last month, when JetBrains updated  
their Scala plugin - then I switched to IntelliJ. The transition was  
very smooth.

So start with any one of the IDEs, and once you've figured out what do  
don't like about that very IDE, you can look around whether another  
IDE might do it better.

And anyways, if there really was a best IDE, it would probably be  
the only IDE (the causality goes both ways). It's always a matter of  
needs, prior experience, taste ...

Best,
Clemens

On 9-Apr-09, at 5:38 AM, Alexander Kellett wrote:


 actually my biggest blocker (and still my blocker) is getting a
 working coding environment.

 there is so much contradictory information on which ide is the best.
 it would be really nice to have a document that talks about the pro's
 and con's of each ide.

 in the rails/osx world its easy: use textmate unless you have a
 predisposition for something else.

 not the case for lift / scala in general.

 i know, boring... but i think it really would help to have such a
 document to help people decide.

 On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Charles F. Munat c...@munat.com  
 wrote:

 I'm writing a proposal for a presentation on moving from Rails to  
 Lift.

 A couple of stumbling blocks that I've mentioned are:

 1. Understanding and taking advantage of immutable constructs.

 2. Getting the hang of the view-centric approach to MVC.

 Before I go much further, I'd like to poll this list for things that
 others think should be included. For former or current Rails  
 developers
 like myself, What sorts of things gave you the most trouble when  
 moving
 to Lift (or trying it out)? What would you like to have had someone
 explain to you to make the transition easier?

 Thanks for any help!

 Chas.




 


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Lift] Re: Rails - Lift

2009-04-09 Thread Josh Suereth
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Clemens Oertel clemens.oer...@gmail.comwrote:


 I don't think it's necessary to make a final decision about your IDE
 at any time. AFAIK, all major IDEs work quite well with Maven's pom
 files, so it's very easy to switch IDEs at any time.


WOAAAH  I beg to differ.   Actually some IDEs work much better with
Maven pom's than others.  It depends on how you like to arrange your
projects and work on them.  (At work, the IntelliJ users get a much
different feel for multi-module projects than Eclipse users).

As you said in the lower portion, choosing an IDE is more about what you're
comfortable with.   As I know Eclipse the best I am most productive in it
(being a plugin contributor helps here ;) ).  I have coded scala in a text
editor (and sometimes resort to that at times), but in general I am more
efficient in eclipse as I began to think in eclipse when I code.  I'm
positive this is different for different users.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Lift] Re: Rails - Lift

2009-04-09 Thread Charles F. Munat

Ah, I get it now.

Jacob Grydholt Jensen wrote:
 No, he is talking about *developers* switching from rails to lift, not 
 projects.
 
 /grydholt
 
  

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Lift] Re: Rails - Lift

2009-04-09 Thread Charles F. Munat

This is interesting. I'll think about this. Thanks.

Chas.

Alexander Kellett wrote:
 actually my biggest blocker (and still my blocker) is getting a
 working coding environment.
 
 there is so much contradictory information on which ide is the best.
 it would be really nice to have a document that talks about the pro's
 and con's of each ide.
 
 in the rails/osx world its easy: use textmate unless you have a
 predisposition for something else.
 
 not the case for lift / scala in general.
 
 i know, boring... but i think it really would help to have such a
 document to help people decide.
 
 On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Charles F. Munat c...@munat.com wrote:
 I'm writing a proposal for a presentation on moving from Rails to Lift.

 A couple of stumbling blocks that I've mentioned are:

 1. Understanding and taking advantage of immutable constructs.

 2. Getting the hang of the view-centric approach to MVC.

 Before I go much further, I'd like to poll this list for things that
 others think should be included. For former or current Rails developers
 like myself, What sorts of things gave you the most trouble when moving
 to Lift (or trying it out)? What would you like to have had someone
 explain to you to make the transition easier?

 Thanks for any help!

 Chas.

 
  

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Lift] Re: Rails - Lift

2009-04-09 Thread Charles F. Munat

I was thinking that I'd start with Textmate, since I've used that the 
most and it's what most Rails developers use, and then move to NetBeans, 
since that seems to be pretty popular. But I could take a quick look at 
Eclipse, too.

David Pollak wrote:
 
 
 On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Alexander Kellett lypa...@gmail.com 
 mailto:lypa...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 
 actually my biggest blocker (and still my blocker) is getting a
 working coding environment.
 
 there is so much contradictory information on which ide is the best.
 it would be really nice to have a document that talks about the pro's
 and con's of each ide.
 
 in the rails/osx world its easy: use textmate unless you have a
 predisposition for something else.
 
 
 I spent a lot of time coding Scala and Lift with emacs and Textmate. 
  They work fine.
 
 While my current IDE of choice is NetBeans, I'm not convinced that an 
 IDE is better than a good text editor.
  
 
 
 
 not the case for lift / scala in general.
 
 i know, boring... but i think it really would help to have such a
 document to help people decide.
 
 On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Charles F. Munat c...@munat.com
 mailto:c...@munat.com wrote:
  
   I'm writing a proposal for a presentation on moving from Rails to
 Lift.
  
   A couple of stumbling blocks that I've mentioned are:
  
   1. Understanding and taking advantage of immutable constructs.
  
   2. Getting the hang of the view-centric approach to MVC.
  
   Before I go much further, I'd like to poll this list for things that
   others think should be included. For former or current Rails
 developers
   like myself, What sorts of things gave you the most trouble when
 moving
   to Lift (or trying it out)? What would you like to have had someone
   explain to you to make the transition easier?
  
   Thanks for any help!
  
   Chas.
  
   
  
 
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
 Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
 Git some: http://github.com/dpp
 
  

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Lift] Re: Rails - Lift

2009-04-09 Thread TylerWeir

It's not an editor/IDE war unless someone brings up Vim or Emacs,
so...

I've been using Vim+Scala+Ctags since I started.

I'd recommend not getting hung-up on which editor is the best  just
start coding.


On Apr 9, 3:01 pm, Charles F. Munat c...@munat.com wrote:
 I was thinking that I'd start with Textmate, since I've used that the
 most and it's what most Rails developers use, and then move to NetBeans,
 since that seems to be pretty popular. But I could take a quick look at
 Eclipse, too.



 David Pollak wrote:

  On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Alexander Kellett lypa...@gmail.com
  mailto:lypa...@gmail.com wrote:

      actually my biggest blocker (and still my blocker) is getting a
      working coding environment.

      there is so much contradictory information on which ide is the best.
      it would be really nice to have a document that talks about the pro's
      and con's of each ide.

      in the rails/osx world its easy: use textmate unless you have a
      predisposition for something else.

  I spent a lot of time coding Scala and Lift with emacs and Textmate.
   They work fine.

  While my current IDE of choice is NetBeans, I'm not convinced that an
  IDE is better than a good text editor.

      not the case for lift / scala in general.

      i know, boring... but i think it really would help to have such a
      document to help people decide.

      On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Charles F. Munat c...@munat.com
      mailto:c...@munat.com wrote:

        I'm writing a proposal for a presentation on moving from Rails to
      Lift.

        A couple of stumbling blocks that I've mentioned are:

        1. Understanding and taking advantage of immutable constructs.

        2. Getting the hang of the view-centric approach to MVC.

        Before I go much further, I'd like to poll this list for things that
        others think should be included. For former or current Rails
      developers
        like myself, What sorts of things gave you the most trouble when
      moving
        to Lift (or trying it out)? What would you like to have had someone
        explain to you to make the transition easier?

        Thanks for any help!

        Chas.

  --
  Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net
  Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
  Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp
  Git some:http://github.com/dpp
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Lift] Re: Rails - Lift

2009-04-09 Thread Charles F. Munat

Can't do them all, but I'd mention Emacs and Vim. Maybe show a slide of 
what they look like.

Chas.

TylerWeir wrote:
 It's not an editor/IDE war unless someone brings up Vim or Emacs,
 so...
 
 I've been using Vim+Scala+Ctags since I started.
 
 I'd recommend not getting hung-up on which editor is the best  just
 start coding.
 
 
 On Apr 9, 3:01 pm, Charles F. Munat c...@munat.com wrote:
 I was thinking that I'd start with Textmate, since I've used that the
 most and it's what most Rails developers use, and then move to NetBeans,
 since that seems to be pretty popular. But I could take a quick look at
 Eclipse, too.



 David Pollak wrote:

 On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Alexander Kellett lypa...@gmail.com
 mailto:lypa...@gmail.com wrote:
 actually my biggest blocker (and still my blocker) is getting a
 working coding environment.
 there is so much contradictory information on which ide is the best.
 it would be really nice to have a document that talks about the pro's
 and con's of each ide.
 in the rails/osx world its easy: use textmate unless you have a
 predisposition for something else.
 I spent a lot of time coding Scala and Lift with emacs and Textmate.
  They work fine.
 While my current IDE of choice is NetBeans, I'm not convinced that an
 IDE is better than a good text editor.
 not the case for lift / scala in general.
 i know, boring... but i think it really would help to have such a
 document to help people decide.
 On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Charles F. Munat c...@munat.com
 mailto:c...@munat.com wrote:
   I'm writing a proposal for a presentation on moving from Rails to
 Lift.
   A couple of stumbling blocks that I've mentioned are:
   1. Understanding and taking advantage of immutable constructs.
   2. Getting the hang of the view-centric approach to MVC.
   Before I go much further, I'd like to poll this list for things that
   others think should be included. For former or current Rails
 developers
   like myself, What sorts of things gave you the most trouble when
 moving
   to Lift (or trying it out)? What would you like to have had someone
   explain to you to make the transition easier?
   Thanks for any help!
   Chas.
 --
 Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net
 Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
 Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp
 Git some:http://github.com/dpp
  

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---