Heiko Seeberger heiko.seeber...@googlemail.com writes:
Hi,
On 5 February 2010 22:11, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen je...@ingolfs.dk wrote:
2) is the cleanest solution since the choice of logging backend is made
explicit. But this requires people to change their poms in order to get
any logging.
(Moved from committers list)
Hi,
A fix is on RB (http://reviewboard.liftweb.net/r/198/) for Issue 309
that changes the Lift internal logging to always go through Slf4j (a
logging facade that provides a uniform logging interface to different
logging backends such as Log4j and logback)
Since
Hi,
On 5 February 2010 22:11, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen je...@ingolfs.dk wrote:
2) is the cleanest solution since the choice of logging backend is made
explicit. But this requires people to change their poms in order to get
any logging.
Let's go for 2) because in real-world projects people will
