Id say that it would be easier to use a match statement as part of the
val assignment... The current code is just using reflection, so
factoring into a case statement shouldnt be too tough right?
Thoughts?
Cheers, Tim
On 5 Oct 2009, at 16:48, Indrajit Raychaudhuri wrote:
>
>
>
> On 05/10/0
On 05/10/09 5:29 PM, Timothy Perrett wrote:
>
> So I just wrote a Jetty 6 wrapper - getting the packaging working was
> not ideal and not as flexible as Jetty 7 jetty-runner.
Yes, just took a look at jetty-runner. Feature wise, it's blows away the
older mechanism man!
>
> Any thoughts in and
On 05/10/09 1:37 PM, Timothy Perrett wrote:
> I know I could write a jetty 6 wrapper, but that is my fallback
> position as something more OOTB would be preferable.
I am in complete agreement with you on this.
/Indrajit
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this m
So I just wrote a Jetty 6 wrapper - getting the packaging working was
not ideal and not as flexible as Jetty 7 jetty-runner.
Any thoughts in and around altering the lift code to adjust the
package based on jetty version?
Cheers, Tim
On Oct 5, 9:07 am, Timothy Perrett wrote:
> Indrajit,
>
> You
Indrajit,
Your right, jetty-runner is Jetty 7. The only tie we have to Jetty 6
would be this line:
val cc = Class.forName
("org.mortbay.util.ajax.ContinuationSupport")
It would be trivial to add a match or whatever that determined the
correct type to use... The question is, why haven't we
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri
wrote:
>
> Tim,
>
> Interestingly, we are trying out something similar in a project here and
> this is absolutely cool stuff.
>
> In fact, Zimbra Desktop does this too. Pure Prism+Jetty bundled as
> 'desktop application'.
>
> That you can have
Tim,
Interestingly, we are trying out something similar in a project here and
this is absolutely cool stuff.
In fact, Zimbra Desktop does this too. Pure Prism+Jetty bundled as
'desktop application'.
That you can have 'double-click' friendly application helps :-)
Few notes:
1. Embedding Jett
Viktor, you and I should not be up this late on a sunday! ;-)
You have to see this: http://blogs.webtide.com/janb/entry/jetty_runner
Im going to hash this together as a maven assembly; if it works, then
i'll write a blog and stuff it on the wiki... this could really make
self deploying apps very
Thanks for the linky, mate!
Was a good read :)
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Timothy Perrett wrote:
>
> Just some more fuel for this debate:
>
> http://technically.us/code/x/to-jettison-geronimo/
>
> Cheers, Tim
>
> On Oct 4, 8:46 pm, Timothy Perrett wrote:
> > Guys,
> >
> > Of late i've been
Just some more fuel for this debate:
http://technically.us/code/x/to-jettison-geronimo/
Cheers, Tim
On Oct 4, 8:46 pm, Timothy Perrett wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Of late i've been having several discussions with people about how
> they deploy there lift apps... So, how do you deploy yours?
>
> Specifi
10 matches
Mail list logo
