[Lift] Re: Js normalizations
+! On Mar 7, 11:11 pm, Heiko Seeberger heiko.seeber...@googlemail.com wrote: On 7 March 2010 19:37, Marius marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote: If you think that this makes sense I'll add a ticket and put it in my backlog. Makes a lot of sense for me. Go for it! Heiko Company: weiglewilczek.com Blog: heikoseeberger.name Follow me: twitter.com/hseeberger OSGi on Scala: scalamodules.org Lift, the simply functional web framework: liftweb.net -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
Re: [Lift] Re: Js normalizations
David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com writes: On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Peter Robinett pe...@bubblefoundry.com wrote: +! Does this translate to I vote you must do this? ;-) ``I vote to do this, and throw an exception if the vote is empty''? -- Jim Wise jw...@draga.com pgp5RWWR8EaxM.pgp Description: PGP signature
[Lift] Re: Js normalizations
Like Heiko, I vote for Marius to do what he proposes. ;-) On Mar 8, 9:47 am, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Peter Robinett pe...@bubblefoundry.comwrote: +! Does this translate to I vote you must do this? ;-) +1 On Mar 7, 11:11 pm, Heiko Seeberger heiko.seeber...@googlemail.com wrote: On 7 March 2010 19:37, Marius marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote: If you think that this makes sense I'll add a ticket and put it in my backlog. Makes a lot of sense for me. Go for it! Heiko Company: weiglewilczek.com Blog: heikoseeberger.name Follow me: twitter.com/hseeberger OSGi on Scala: scalamodules.org Lift, the simply functional web framework: liftweb.net -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comliftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. -- Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
[Lift] Re: Js normalizations
I'm not sure about the fastness as I also have other things and a 4 days baby boy ;) ... but I think this is fairly important and I'll try to prioritize. On Mar 7, 8:52 pm, Mads Hartmann Jensen mads...@gmail.com wrote: Marius, I think this sounds like a great idea - but I only have 2 Lift projects under development so it would be quite fast for me to make any changes Mads On 07/03/2010, at 19.37, Marius wrote: Dear all, Looking at Js api and specifically JsCmds and JqJsCmds (the Js abstractions vs Jquery specify abstractions) IMHO there are several redundancies: 1. JsCmds has ~ method for referencing member of objects (i.e elem.focus()) but JQuery abstractions have method that chains a JQueryLeft with JQueryRight 2. JQueryLeft and JQueryRight also seems redundant because JsExp already have the support for building expressions, composing them, chaining expressions etc. My proposal is to normalize this API and have the JQuery specific things to rely on the JsExp support. I'm aware that this would lead to some breaking changes but I believe they are necessary. If you think that this makes sense I'll add a ticket and put it in my backlog. Thoughts? Br's, Marius -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
Re: [Lift] Re: Js normalizations
Can it be changed with a deprecation phase? - Mariusmarius.dan...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not sure about the fastness as I also have other things and a 4 days baby boy ;) ... but I think this is fairly important and I'll try to prioritize. On Mar 7, 8:52 pm, Mads Hartmann Jensen mads...@gmail.com wrote: Marius, I think this sounds like a great idea - but I only have 2 Lift projects under development so it would be quite fast for me to make any changes Mads On 07/03/2010, at 19.37, Marius wrote: Dear all, Looking at Js api and specifically JsCmds and JqJsCmds (the Js abstractions vs Jquery specify abstractions) IMHO there are several redundancies: 1. JsCmds has ~ method for referencing member of objects (i.e elem.focus()) but JQuery abstractions have method that chains a JQueryLeft with JQueryRight 2. JQueryLeft and JQueryRight also seems redundant because JsExp already have the support for building expressions, composing them, chaining expressions etc. My proposal is to normalize this API and have the JQuery specific things to rely on the JsExp support. I'm aware that this would lead to some breaking changes but I believe they are necessary. If you think that this makes sense I'll add a ticket and put it in my backlog. Thoughts? Br's, Marius -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
[Lift] Re: Js normalizations
Yes that's the idea ... I apologize I didn't actually mean to just remove things out of the sudden. But I'll know more once I get to dig deeper. On Mar 7, 10:13 pm, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: Can it be changed with a deprecation phase? - Mariusmarius.dan...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not sure about the fastness as I also have other things and a 4 days baby boy ;) ... but I think this is fairly important and I'll try to prioritize. On Mar 7, 8:52 pm, Mads Hartmann Jensen mads...@gmail.com wrote: Marius, I think this sounds like a great idea - but I only have 2 Lift projects under development so it would be quite fast for me to make any changes Mads On 07/03/2010, at 19.37, Marius wrote: Dear all, Looking at Js api and specifically JsCmds and JqJsCmds (the Js abstractions vs Jquery specify abstractions) IMHO there are several redundancies: 1. JsCmds has ~ method for referencing member of objects (i.e elem.focus()) but JQuery abstractions have method that chains a JQueryLeft with JQueryRight 2. JQueryLeft and JQueryRight also seems redundant because JsExp already have the support for building expressions, composing them, chaining expressions etc. My proposal is to normalize this API and have the JQuery specific things to rely on the JsExp support. I'm aware that this would lead to some breaking changes but I believe they are necessary. If you think that this makes sense I'll add a ticket and put it in my backlog. Thoughts? Br's, Marius -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
Re: [Lift] Re: Js normalizations
Then it sounds good to me, although that doesn't count as much since I must admit I haven't really had the opportunity to use Lift's ajax and javascript parts. - Mariusmarius.dan...@gmail.com wrote: Yes that's the idea ... I apologize I didn't actually mean to just remove things out of the sudden. But I'll know more once I get to dig deeper. On Mar 7, 10:13 pm, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: Can it be changed with a deprecation phase? - Mariusmarius.dan...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not sure about the fastness as I also have other things and a 4 days baby boy ;) ... but I think this is fairly important and I'll try to prioritize. On Mar 7, 8:52 pm, Mads Hartmann Jensen mads...@gmail.com wrote: Marius, I think this sounds like a great idea - but I only have 2 Lift projects under development so it would be quite fast for me to make any changes Mads On 07/03/2010, at 19.37, Marius wrote: Dear all, Looking at Js api and specifically JsCmds and JqJsCmds (the Js abstractions vs Jquery specify abstractions) IMHO there are several redundancies: 1. JsCmds has ~ method for referencing member of objects (i.e elem.focus()) but JQuery abstractions have method that chains a JQueryLeft with JQueryRight 2. JQueryLeft and JQueryRight also seems redundant because JsExp already have the support for building expressions, composing them, chaining expressions etc. My proposal is to normalize this API and have the JQuery specific things to rely on the JsExp support. I'm aware that this would lead to some breaking changes but I believe they are necessary. If you think that this makes sense I'll add a ticket and put it in my backlog. Thoughts? Br's, Marius -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
[Lift] Re: Js normalizations
You must be unique :) On Mar 7, 10:21 pm, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: Then it sounds good to me, although that doesn't count as much since I must admit I haven't really had the opportunity to use Lift's ajax and javascript parts. - Mariusmarius.dan...@gmail.com wrote: Yes that's the idea ... I apologize I didn't actually mean to just remove things out of the sudden. But I'll know more once I get to dig deeper. On Mar 7, 10:13 pm, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: Can it be changed with a deprecation phase? - Mariusmarius.dan...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not sure about the fastness as I also have other things and a 4 days baby boy ;) ... but I think this is fairly important and I'll try to prioritize. On Mar 7, 8:52 pm, Mads Hartmann Jensen mads...@gmail.com wrote: Marius, I think this sounds like a great idea - but I only have 2 Lift projects under development so it would be quite fast for me to make any changes Mads On 07/03/2010, at 19.37, Marius wrote: Dear all, Looking at Js api and specifically JsCmds and JqJsCmds (the Js abstractions vs Jquery specify abstractions) IMHO there are several redundancies: 1. JsCmds has ~ method for referencing member of objects (i.e elem.focus()) but JQuery abstractions have method that chains a JQueryLeft with JQueryRight 2. JQueryLeft and JQueryRight also seems redundant because JsExp already have the support for building expressions, composing them, chaining expressions etc. My proposal is to normalize this API and have the JQuery specific things to rely on the JsExp support. I'm aware that this would lead to some breaking changes but I believe they are necessary. If you think that this makes sense I'll add a ticket and put it in my backlog. Thoughts? Br's, Marius -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
Re: [Lift] Re: Js normalizations
I may have a project coming up that would use it though. :) - Mariusmarius.dan...@gmail.com wrote: You must be unique :) On Mar 7, 10:21 pm, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: Then it sounds good to me, although that doesn't count as much since I must admit I haven't really had the opportunity to use Lift's ajax and javascript parts. - Mariusmarius.dan...@gmail.com wrote: Yes that's the idea ... I apologize I didn't actually mean to just remove things out of the sudden. But I'll know more once I get to dig deeper. On Mar 7, 10:13 pm, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: Can it be changed with a deprecation phase? - Mariusmarius.dan...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not sure about the fastness as I also have other things and a 4 days baby boy ;) ... but I think this is fairly important and I'll try to prioritize. On Mar 7, 8:52 pm, Mads Hartmann Jensen mads...@gmail.com wrote: Marius, I think this sounds like a great idea - but I only have 2 Lift projects under development so it would be quite fast for me to make any changes Mads On 07/03/2010, at 19.37, Marius wrote: Dear all, Looking at Js api and specifically JsCmds and JqJsCmds (the Js abstractions vs Jquery specify abstractions) IMHO there are several redundancies: 1. JsCmds has ~ method for referencing member of objects (i.e elem.focus()) but JQuery abstractions have method that chains a JQueryLeft with JQueryRight 2. JQueryLeft and JQueryRight also seems redundant because JsExp already have the support for building expressions, composing them, chaining expressions etc. My proposal is to normalize this API and have the JQuery specific things to rely on the JsExp support. I'm aware that this would lead to some breaking changes but I believe they are necessary. If you think that this makes sense I'll add a ticket and put it in my backlog. Thoughts? Br's, Marius -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
