Re: [Lift] Re: Lift 2.0 on Scala 2.8 update

2010-02-10 Thread Indrajit Raychaudhuri

scalacheck_2.8.0.Beta1 used in the branch 280_port_refresh now.

Tim, see if your build works on this branch now.

Cheers, Indrajit

On 04/02/10 12:12 PM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri wrote:

Sure, I will. This would go in as regular 280_port_refresh update activity.

Cheers, Indrajit

On 04/02/10 3:13 AM, Timothy Perrett wrote:

Awesome stuff :-)

IRC, will you take the lead on this?

Cheers, Tim

Sent from my iPhone

On 3 Feb 2010, at 20:33, Rickard Nilsson rickyn...@gmail.com wrote:


I have now built ScalaCheck for Scala 2.8.0 Beta 1:

http://groups.google.com/group/scalacheck/browse_thread/thread/5a1e216fa82ed91



Regards,
Rickard

Den 2010-01-31 21:57:07 skrev David Pollak
feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com:


The problem is that there's no ScalaCheck version for Scala 2.8.0
Beta1.
The Beta1-RC5 compilation of ScalaCheck was causing the wrong Scala
libraries to be loaded.

This is seriously suboptimal.

On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Timothy Perrett
timo...@getintheloop.euwrote:


Im just doing a fresh clone and checkout to see if something was
screwed in my local build.

Cheers, Tim

On Jan 31, 7:44 pm, Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.com wrote:
 I was suspecting Java 1.5 (if you were on 10.5). That's not the
case. So
 I am completely stumped now.

 See if you can compare with the Hudson copy

(http://hudson.scala-tools.org/view/Lift/job/lift-framework-scala280/)

 - IRC

 On 01/02/10 12:55 AM, Timothy Perrett wrote:



  macbookpro:lift-framework timperrett$ java -version




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.



Re: [Lift] Re: Lift 2.0 on Scala 2.8 update

2010-02-03 Thread Rickard Nilsson

I have now built ScalaCheck for Scala 2.8.0 Beta 1:

http://groups.google.com/group/scalacheck/browse_thread/thread/5a1e216fa82ed91

Regards,
  Rickard

Den 2010-01-31 21:57:07 skrev David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com:


The problem is that there's no ScalaCheck version for Scala 2.8.0 Beta1.
The Beta1-RC5 compilation of ScalaCheck was causing the wrong Scala
libraries to be loaded.

This is seriously suboptimal.

On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Timothy Perrett
timo...@getintheloop.euwrote:


Im just doing a fresh clone and checkout to see if something was
screwed in my local build.

Cheers, Tim

On Jan 31, 7:44 pm, Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.com wrote:
 I was suspecting Java 1.5 (if you were on 10.5). That's not the case.  
So

 I am completely stumped now.

 See if you can compare with the Hudson copy
 (http://hudson.scala-tools.org/view/Lift/job/lift-framework-scala280/)

 - IRC

 On 01/02/10 12:55 AM, Timothy Perrett wrote:



  macbookpro:lift-framework timperrett$ java -version
  java version 1.6.0_17
  Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_17-b04-248-10M3025)
  Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 14.3-b01-101, mixed mode)

  macbookpro:lift-framework timperrett$ mvn -version
  Apache Maven 2.2.1 (r801777; 2009-08-06 20:16:01+0100)
  Java version: 1.6.0_17
  Java home:  
/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.6.0/

  Home
  Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: MacRoman
  OS name: mac os x version: 10.6.2 arch: x86_64 Family: mac

  Cheers, Tim

  On Jan 31, 6:59 pm, Indrajit Raychaudhuriindraj...@gmail.com   
wrote:

  Hmm, the effective pom is perfect! Something else somewhere.
  Are you on OSX 10.5 or 10.6?

  - IRC

  On 01/02/10 12:11 AM, Timothy Perrett wrote:

  I was puzzled because the deps looked fine ;)

  Here's the effective pom:

  ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
  !--
 
==
  --
  !--
  --
  !-- Generated by Maven Help Plugin on 1/31/10 6:40
  PM  --
  !-- See:http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-help-plugin/
  --
  !--
  --
  !--
 
==
  --

  !--
 
==
  --
  !--
  --
  !-- Effective POM for
  project  --
  !-- 'net.liftweb:lift-common:jar:2.0-scala280-
  SNAPSHOT'--
  !--
  --
  !--
 
==
  --

  project xmlns=http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0;
xmlns:xsi=http://
 www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance xsi:schemaLocation=http://
 
maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd;
  modelVersion4.0.0/modelVersion
  parent
artifactIdlift-base/artifactId
groupIdnet.liftweb/groupId
version2.0-scala280-SNAPSHOT/version
  /parent
  groupIdnet.liftweb/groupId
  artifactIdlift-common/artifactId
  version2.0-scala280-SNAPSHOT/version
  nameLift Common/name
  descriptionCommon Interfaces for Lift and perhaps other
  frameworks/description
  urlhttp://dev.liftweb.net/framework/lift-base/lift-common
/url
  inceptionYear2006/inceptionYear
  organization
nameWorldWide Conferencing, LLC/name
urlhttp://www.liftweb.net/url
  /organization
  licenses
license
  nameApache License, Version 2.0/name
  urlhttp://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt/url
  distributionrepo/distribution
  commentsLift open source software is licensed under an
Apache
  2.0 license./comments
/license
  /licenses
  mailingLists
mailingList
  nameUser and Developer Discussion List/name
   
subscribeliftweb+subscr...@googlegroups.comliftweb%2bsubscr...@googlegroups.com

/subscribe
   
unsubscribeliftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comliftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com

/unsubscribe
  postliftweb@googlegroups.com/post
  archivehttp://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/archive
/mailingList
mailingList
  nameCommitter Discussion List/name
  archivehttp://groups.google.com/group/lift-committers/
  archive
/mailingList
mailingList
  nameAnnouncement List/name
   
subscribelift-announce+subscr...@googlegroups.comlift-announce%2bsubscr...@googlegroups.com

/subscribe
   
unsubscribelift-announce+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comlift-announce%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com

/
  unsubscribe
  archivehttp://groups.google.com/group/lift-announce
/archive
/mailingList
  /mailingLists
  developers
developer
  iddpp/id
  nameDavid Pollak/name
  emaildpp [at] liftweb.net/email
  roles
roleBDFL/role
roleFeeder of the Bears/role
  /roles
  timezone-8/timezone

Re: [Lift] Re: Lift 2.0 on Scala 2.8 update

2010-02-03 Thread Timothy Perrett

Awesome stuff :-)

IRC, will you take the lead on this?

Cheers, Tim

Sent from my iPhone

On 3 Feb 2010, at 20:33, Rickard Nilsson rickyn...@gmail.com wrote:


I have now built ScalaCheck for Scala 2.8.0 Beta 1:

http://groups.google.com/group/scalacheck/browse_thread/thread/5a1e216fa82ed91

Regards,
 Rickard

Den 2010-01-31 21:57:07 skrev David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com 
:


The problem is that there's no ScalaCheck version for Scala 2.8.0  
Beta1.

The Beta1-RC5 compilation of ScalaCheck was causing the wrong Scala
libraries to be loaded.

This is seriously suboptimal.

On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Timothy Perrett
timo...@getintheloop.euwrote:


Im just doing a fresh clone and checkout to see if something was
screwed in my local build.

Cheers, Tim

On Jan 31, 7:44 pm, Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.com  
wrote:
 I was suspecting Java 1.5 (if you were on 10.5). That's not the  
case. So

 I am completely stumped now.

 See if you can compare with the Hudson copy
 (http://hudson.scala-tools.org/view/Lift/job/lift-framework-scala280/ 
)


 - IRC

 On 01/02/10 12:55 AM, Timothy Perrett wrote:



  macbookpro:lift-framework timperrett$ java -version


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.



Re: [Lift] Re: Lift 2.0 on Scala 2.8 update

2010-02-03 Thread Indrajit Raychaudhuri

Sure, I will. This would go in as regular 280_port_refresh update activity.

Cheers, Indrajit

On 04/02/10 3:13 AM, Timothy Perrett wrote:

Awesome stuff :-)

IRC, will you take the lead on this?

Cheers, Tim

Sent from my iPhone

On 3 Feb 2010, at 20:33, Rickard Nilsson rickyn...@gmail.com wrote:


I have now built ScalaCheck for Scala 2.8.0 Beta 1:

http://groups.google.com/group/scalacheck/browse_thread/thread/5a1e216fa82ed91


Regards,
Rickard

Den 2010-01-31 21:57:07 skrev David Pollak
feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com:


The problem is that there's no ScalaCheck version for Scala 2.8.0 Beta1.
The Beta1-RC5 compilation of ScalaCheck was causing the wrong Scala
libraries to be loaded.

This is seriously suboptimal.

On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Timothy Perrett
timo...@getintheloop.euwrote:


Im just doing a fresh clone and checkout to see if something was
screwed in my local build.

Cheers, Tim

On Jan 31, 7:44 pm, Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.com wrote:
 I was suspecting Java 1.5 (if you were on 10.5). That's not the
case. So
 I am completely stumped now.

 See if you can compare with the Hudson copy

(http://hudson.scala-tools.org/view/Lift/job/lift-framework-scala280/)

 - IRC

 On 01/02/10 12:55 AM, Timothy Perrett wrote:



  macbookpro:lift-framework timperrett$ java -version




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.



[Lift] Re: Lift 2.0 on Scala 2.8 update

2010-01-31 Thread Timothy Perrett
I just attempted to build the branch and got the following:

Running net.liftweb.common.BoxSpecTest
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireExecutionException: org/specs/
matcher/AnyBaseMatchers$$anon$4; nested exception is
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/specs/matcher/AnyBaseMatchers$$anon
$4
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/specs/matcher/AnyBaseMatchers$$anon
$4
at org.specs.Specification.init(Specification.scala:43)
at net.liftweb.common.BoxSpec$.init(BoxSpec.scala:26)
at net.liftweb.common.BoxSpec$.clinit(BoxSpec.scala)
at net.liftweb.common.BoxSpecTest.init(BoxSpec.scala:25)
at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0
(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance
(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance
(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:27)
at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:
513)
at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:355)
at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:308)
at org.specs.runner.JUnitSuiteRunner.testSuite
(JUnitSuiteRunner.scala:37)
at org.specs.runner.JUnitSuiteRunner.run
(JUnitSuiteRunner.scala:45)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.execute
(JUnit4TestSet.java:59)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.executeTestSet
(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:115)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.execute
(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:102)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.run(Surefire.java:180)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.runSuitesInProcess
(SurefireBooter.java:350)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.main
(SurefireBooter.java:1021)
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
org.specs.matcher.AnyBaseMatchers$$anon$4
at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:197)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:188)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:315)
at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:
330)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:250)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:
398)
... 22 more
Caused by: java.util.zip.ZipException: invalid bit length repeat
at java.util.zip.InflaterInputStream.read
(InflaterInputStream.java:147)
at sun.misc.Resource.getBytes(Resource.java:108)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:
256)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$000(URLClassLoader.java:56)
at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:195)
... 28 more

Obviously an issue with specs, but just thought id report it to
hopefully add some clarity.

Cheers, Tim

On Jan 27, 8:15 pm, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
 On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen je...@ingolfs.dkwrote:

  Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.com writes:

   Some more awesomeness - 280_port_refresh of Lift has moved to
   Scala-2.8.0.Beta1.

   Cheers, Indrajit

  Awesome. How much is supported?

 Right now, nothing... I'm working on fixing some issues and working around
 compiler problems.





   Someone running anything substantial on
  2.8 yet? I really (really!) want to ditch the 2.7 Eclipse plugin for
  2.8

  /Jeppe

  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
  Lift group.
  To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comliftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
  
  .
  For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.

 --
 Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net
 Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
 Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp
 Surf the harmonics

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.



Re: [Lift] Re: Lift 2.0 on Scala 2.8 update

2010-01-31 Thread Indrajit Raychaudhuri

Welcome back, Tim!

I am suspecting that an incorrect spec version is sneaking in.
Just to confirm - the maintained 2.8 port branch is 280_port_refresh.

Cheers, Indrajit

On 31/01/10 11:02 PM, Timothy Perrett wrote:

I just attempted to build the branch and got the following:

Running net.liftweb.common.BoxSpecTest
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireExecutionException: org/specs/
matcher/AnyBaseMatchers$$anon$4; nested exception is
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/specs/matcher/AnyBaseMatchers$$anon
$4
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/specs/matcher/AnyBaseMatchers$$anon
$4
 at org.specs.Specification.init(Specification.scala:43)
 at net.liftweb.common.BoxSpec$.init(BoxSpec.scala:26)
 at net.liftweb.common.BoxSpec$.clinit(BoxSpec.scala)
 at net.liftweb.common.BoxSpecTest.init(BoxSpec.scala:25)
 at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0
(Native Method)
 at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance
(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:39)
 at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance
(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:27)
 at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:
513)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:355)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:308)
 at org.specs.runner.JUnitSuiteRunner.testSuite
(JUnitSuiteRunner.scala:37)
 at org.specs.runner.JUnitSuiteRunner.run
(JUnitSuiteRunner.scala:45)
 at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.execute
(JUnit4TestSet.java:59)
 at
org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.executeTestSet
(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:115)
 at
org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.execute
(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:102)
 at org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.run(Surefire.java:180)
 at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
 at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
 at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
 at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
 at
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.runSuitesInProcess
(SurefireBooter.java:350)
 at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.main
(SurefireBooter.java:1021)
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
org.specs.matcher.AnyBaseMatchers$$anon$4
 at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:197)
 at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
 at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:188)
 at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:315)
 at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:
330)
 at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:250)
 at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:
398)
 ... 22 more
Caused by: java.util.zip.ZipException: invalid bit length repeat
 at java.util.zip.InflaterInputStream.read
(InflaterInputStream.java:147)
 at sun.misc.Resource.getBytes(Resource.java:108)
 at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:
256)
 at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$000(URLClassLoader.java:56)
 at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:195)
 ... 28 more

Obviously an issue with specs, but just thought id report it to
hopefully add some clarity.

Cheers, Tim

On Jan 27, 8:15 pm, David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:

On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Jeppe Nejsum Madsenje...@ingolfs.dkwrote:


Indrajit Raychaudhuriindraj...@gmail.com  writes:



Some more awesomeness - 280_port_refresh of Lift has moved to
Scala-2.8.0.Beta1.



Cheers, Indrajit



Awesome. How much is supported?


Right now, nothing... I'm working on fixing some issues and working around
compiler problems.






  Someone running anything substantial on
2.8 yet? I really (really!) want to ditch the 2.7 Eclipse plugin for
2.8



/Jeppe



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comliftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.


--
Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net
Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp
Surf the harmonics




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 

Re: [Lift] Re: Lift 2.0 on Scala 2.8 update

2010-01-31 Thread Timothy Perrett
Thanks Indrajit :)

That was my thought also, running a top level mvn clean install on 
280_port_refresh results in the stack trace below, yes.

Cheers, Tim

On 31 Jan 2010, at 18:07, Indrajit Raychaudhuri wrote:

 Welcome back, Tim!
 
 I am suspecting that an incorrect spec version is sneaking in.
 Just to confirm - the maintained 2.8 port branch is 280_port_refresh.
 
 Cheers, Indrajit
 
 On 31/01/10 11:02 PM, Timothy Perrett wrote:
 I just attempted to build the branch and got the following:
 
 Running net.liftweb.common.BoxSpecTest
 org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireExecutionException: org/specs/
 matcher/AnyBaseMatchers$$anon$4; nested exception is
 java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/specs/matcher/AnyBaseMatchers$$anon
 $4
 java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/specs/matcher/AnyBaseMatchers$$anon
 $4
 at org.specs.Specification.init(Specification.scala:43)
 at net.liftweb.common.BoxSpec$.init(BoxSpec.scala:26)
 at net.liftweb.common.BoxSpec$.clinit(BoxSpec.scala)
 at net.liftweb.common.BoxSpecTest.init(BoxSpec.scala:25)
 at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0
 (Native Method)
 at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance
 (NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:39)
 at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance
 (DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:27)
 at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:
 513)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:355)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:308)
 at org.specs.runner.JUnitSuiteRunner.testSuite
 (JUnitSuiteRunner.scala:37)
 at org.specs.runner.JUnitSuiteRunner.run
 (JUnitSuiteRunner.scala:45)
 at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.execute
 (JUnit4TestSet.java:59)
 at
 org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.executeTestSet
 (AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:115)
 at
 org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.execute
 (AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:102)
 at org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.run(Surefire.java:180)
 at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
 at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
 (NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
 at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
 (DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
 at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
 at
 org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.runSuitesInProcess
 (SurefireBooter.java:350)
 at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.main
 (SurefireBooter.java:1021)
 Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
 org.specs.matcher.AnyBaseMatchers$$anon$4
 at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:197)
 at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
 at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:188)
 at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:315)
 at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:
 330)
 at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:250)
 at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:
 398)
 ... 22 more
 Caused by: java.util.zip.ZipException: invalid bit length repeat
 at java.util.zip.InflaterInputStream.read
 (InflaterInputStream.java:147)
 at sun.misc.Resource.getBytes(Resource.java:108)
 at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:
 256)
 at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$000(URLClassLoader.java:56)
 at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:195)
 ... 28 more
 
 Obviously an issue with specs, but just thought id report it to
 hopefully add some clarity.
 
 Cheers, Tim
 
 On Jan 27, 8:15 pm, David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Jeppe Nejsum 
 Madsenje...@ingolfs.dkwrote:
 
 Indrajit Raychaudhuriindraj...@gmail.com  writes:
 
 Some more awesomeness - 280_port_refresh of Lift has moved to
 Scala-2.8.0.Beta1.
 
 Cheers, Indrajit
 
 Awesome. How much is supported?
 
 Right now, nothing... I'm working on fixing some issues and working around
 compiler problems.
 
 
 
 
 
  Someone running anything substantial on
 2.8 yet? I really (really!) want to ditch the 2.7 Eclipse plugin for
 2.8
 
 /Jeppe
 
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Lift group.
 To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comliftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 .
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
 
 --
 Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net
 Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
 Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp
 Surf the harmonics
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message 

Re: [Lift] Re: Lift 2.0 on Scala 2.8 update

2010-01-31 Thread Indrajit Raychaudhuri

The output is fine. Curious to know what puzzled you in the output.

Can you please send me the output of mvn help:effective-pom for 
lift-common?


Cheers, Indrajit

On 31/01/10 11:47 PM, Timothy Perrett wrote:

However, the dependency tree looks like:

[INFO] 
[INFO] Building Lift Common
[INFO]task-segment: [dependency:tree]
[INFO] 
[INFO] [dependency:tree {execution: default-cli}]
[INFO] net.liftweb:lift-common:jar:2.0-scala280-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] +- org.scala-lang:scala-library:jar:2.8.0.Beta1:compile
[INFO] +- org.scala-tools.testing:specs_2.8.0.Beta1:jar:1.6.2:test
[INFO] +- 
org.scala-tools.testing:scalacheck_2.8.0.Beta1-RC5:jar:1.7-SNAPSHOT:test
[INFO] |  \- org.scala-tools.testing:test-interface:jar:0.2:test
[INFO] \- junit:junit:jar:4.7:test

Which is somewhat puzzling...

Cheers, Tim

On 31 Jan 2010, at 18:07, Indrajit Raychaudhuri wrote:


Welcome back, Tim!

I am suspecting that an incorrect spec version is sneaking in.
Just to confirm - the maintained 2.8 port branch is 280_port_refresh.

Cheers, Indrajit

On 31/01/10 11:02 PM, Timothy Perrett wrote:

I just attempted to build the branch and got the following:

Running net.liftweb.common.BoxSpecTest
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireExecutionException: org/specs/
matcher/AnyBaseMatchers$$anon$4; nested exception is
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/specs/matcher/AnyBaseMatchers$$anon
$4
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/specs/matcher/AnyBaseMatchers$$anon
$4
 at org.specs.Specification.init(Specification.scala:43)
 at net.liftweb.common.BoxSpec$.init(BoxSpec.scala:26)
 at net.liftweb.common.BoxSpec$.clinit(BoxSpec.scala)
 at net.liftweb.common.BoxSpecTest.init(BoxSpec.scala:25)
 at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0
(Native Method)
 at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance
(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:39)
 at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance
(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:27)
 at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:
513)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:355)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:308)
 at org.specs.runner.JUnitSuiteRunner.testSuite
(JUnitSuiteRunner.scala:37)
 at org.specs.runner.JUnitSuiteRunner.run
(JUnitSuiteRunner.scala:45)
 at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.execute
(JUnit4TestSet.java:59)
 at
org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.executeTestSet
(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:115)
 at
org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.execute
(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:102)
 at org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.run(Surefire.java:180)
 at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
 at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
 at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
 at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
 at
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.runSuitesInProcess
(SurefireBooter.java:350)
 at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.main
(SurefireBooter.java:1021)
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
org.specs.matcher.AnyBaseMatchers$$anon$4
 at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:197)
 at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
 at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:188)
 at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:315)
 at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:
330)
 at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:250)
 at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:
398)
 ... 22 more
Caused by: java.util.zip.ZipException: invalid bit length repeat
 at java.util.zip.InflaterInputStream.read
(InflaterInputStream.java:147)
 at sun.misc.Resource.getBytes(Resource.java:108)
 at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:
256)
 at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$000(URLClassLoader.java:56)
 at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:195)
 ... 28 more

Obviously an issue with specs, but just thought id report it to
hopefully add some clarity.

Cheers, Tim

On Jan 27, 8:15 pm, David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:

On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Jeppe Nejsum Madsenje...@ingolfs.dkwrote:


Indrajit Raychaudhuriindraj...@gmail.com   writes:



Some more awesomeness - 280_port_refresh of Lift has moved to
Scala-2.8.0.Beta1.



Cheers, Indrajit



Awesome. How much is supported?


Right now, nothing... I'm working on fixing some issues and working around

Re: [Lift] Re: Lift 2.0 on Scala 2.8 update

2010-01-31 Thread Indrajit Raychaudhuri
I was suspecting Java 1.5 (if you were on 10.5). That's not the case. So 
I am completely stumped now.


See if you can compare with the Hudson copy 
(http://hudson.scala-tools.org/view/Lift/job/lift-framework-scala280/)


- IRC

On 01/02/10 12:55 AM, Timothy Perrett wrote:

macbookpro:lift-framework timperrett$ java -version
java version 1.6.0_17
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_17-b04-248-10M3025)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 14.3-b01-101, mixed mode)

macbookpro:lift-framework timperrett$ mvn -version
Apache Maven 2.2.1 (r801777; 2009-08-06 20:16:01+0100)
Java version: 1.6.0_17
Java home: /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.6.0/
Home
Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: MacRoman
OS name: mac os x version: 10.6.2 arch: x86_64 Family: mac

Cheers, Tim

On Jan 31, 6:59 pm, Indrajit Raychaudhuriindraj...@gmail.com  wrote:

Hmm, the effective pom is perfect! Something else somewhere.
Are you on OSX 10.5 or 10.6?

- IRC

On 01/02/10 12:11 AM, Timothy Perrett wrote:




I was puzzled because the deps looked fine ;)



Here's the effective pom:



?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!--
==
--
!--
--
!-- Generated by Maven Help Plugin on 1/31/10 6:40
PM  --
!-- See:http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-help-plugin/
--
!--
--
!--
==
--



!--
==
--
!--
--
!-- Effective POM for
project  --
!-- 'net.liftweb:lift-common:jar:2.0-scala280-
SNAPSHOT'--
!--
--
!--
==
--



project xmlns=http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0; xmlns:xsi=http://
www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance xsi:schemaLocation=http://
maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd;
modelVersion4.0.0/modelVersion
parent
  artifactIdlift-base/artifactId
  groupIdnet.liftweb/groupId
  version2.0-scala280-SNAPSHOT/version
/parent
groupIdnet.liftweb/groupId
artifactIdlift-common/artifactId
version2.0-scala280-SNAPSHOT/version
nameLift Common/name
descriptionCommon Interfaces for Lift and perhaps other
frameworks/description
urlhttp://dev.liftweb.net/framework/lift-base/lift-common/url
inceptionYear2006/inceptionYear
organization
  nameWorldWide Conferencing, LLC/name
  urlhttp://www.liftweb.net/url
/organization
licenses
  license
nameApache License, Version 2.0/name
urlhttp://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt/url
distributionrepo/distribution
commentsLift open source software is licensed under an Apache
2.0 license./comments
  /license
/licenses
mailingLists
  mailingList
nameUser and Developer Discussion List/name
subscribeliftweb+subscr...@googlegroups.com/subscribe
unsubscribeliftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com/unsubscribe
postliftweb@googlegroups.com/post
archivehttp://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/archive
  /mailingList
  mailingList
nameCommitter Discussion List/name
archivehttp://groups.google.com/group/lift-committers/
archive
  /mailingList
  mailingList
nameAnnouncement List/name
subscribelift-announce+subscr...@googlegroups.com/subscribe
unsubscribelift-announce+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com/
unsubscribe
archivehttp://groups.google.com/group/lift-announce/archive
  /mailingList
/mailingLists
developers
  developer
iddpp/id
nameDavid Pollak/name
emaildpp [at] liftweb.net/email
roles
  roleBDFL/role
  roleFeeder of the Bears/role
/roles
timezone-8/timezone
  /developer
  developer
idBurak.Emir/id
nameBurak Emir/name
  /developer
  developer
idphilipp.schmidt/id
namephilipp.schmidt/name
  /developer
  developer
idcwilkes/id
namecwilkes/name
  /developer
  developer
idjulien.wetterwald/id
namejulien.wetterwald/name
  /developer
  developer
idleppoc/id
nameleppoc/name
  /developer
  developer
idstepan.koltsov/id
namestepan.koltsov/name
  /developer
  developer
idjorge.ortiz/id
nameJorge Ortiz/name
emailjorge [at] liftweb.net/email
timezone-8/timezone
  /developer
  developer
idstevej/id
nameSteve Jenson/name
  /developer
  developer
idalex.boisvert/id
nameAlex Boisvert/name
  /developer
  developer
nameOctoberDan/name
  /developer
  developer
idviktor.klang/id
nameViktor Klang a.k.a. Sevikkla/name
roles
  roleEnhancement specialist/role

[Lift] Re: Lift 2.0 on Scala 2.8 update

2010-01-31 Thread Timothy Perrett
Im just doing a fresh clone and checkout to see if something was
screwed in my local build.

Cheers, Tim

On Jan 31, 7:44 pm, Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.com wrote:
 I was suspecting Java 1.5 (if you were on 10.5). That's not the case. So
 I am completely stumped now.

 See if you can compare with the Hudson copy
 (http://hudson.scala-tools.org/view/Lift/job/lift-framework-scala280/)

 - IRC

 On 01/02/10 12:55 AM, Timothy Perrett wrote:



  macbookpro:lift-framework timperrett$ java -version
  java version 1.6.0_17
  Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_17-b04-248-10M3025)
  Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 14.3-b01-101, mixed mode)

  macbookpro:lift-framework timperrett$ mvn -version
  Apache Maven 2.2.1 (r801777; 2009-08-06 20:16:01+0100)
  Java version: 1.6.0_17
  Java home: /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.6.0/
  Home
  Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: MacRoman
  OS name: mac os x version: 10.6.2 arch: x86_64 Family: mac

  Cheers, Tim

  On Jan 31, 6:59 pm, Indrajit Raychaudhuriindraj...@gmail.com  wrote:
  Hmm, the effective pom is perfect! Something else somewhere.
  Are you on OSX 10.5 or 10.6?

  - IRC

  On 01/02/10 12:11 AM, Timothy Perrett wrote:

  I was puzzled because the deps looked fine ;)

  Here's the effective pom:

  ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
  !--
  ==
  --
  !--
  --
  !-- Generated by Maven Help Plugin on 1/31/10 6:40
  PM                      --
  !-- See:http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-help-plugin/
  --
  !--
  --
  !--
  ==
  --

  !--
  ==
  --
  !--
  --
  !-- Effective POM for
  project                                              --
  !-- 'net.liftweb:lift-common:jar:2.0-scala280-
  SNAPSHOT'                    --
  !--
  --
  !--
  ==
  --

  project xmlns=http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0; xmlns:xsi=http://
 www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance xsi:schemaLocation=http://
  maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd;
      modelVersion4.0.0/modelVersion
      parent
        artifactIdlift-base/artifactId
        groupIdnet.liftweb/groupId
        version2.0-scala280-SNAPSHOT/version
      /parent
      groupIdnet.liftweb/groupId
      artifactIdlift-common/artifactId
      version2.0-scala280-SNAPSHOT/version
      nameLift Common/name
      descriptionCommon Interfaces for Lift and perhaps other
  frameworks/description
      urlhttp://dev.liftweb.net/framework/lift-base/lift-common/url
      inceptionYear2006/inceptionYear
      organization
        nameWorldWide Conferencing, LLC/name
        urlhttp://www.liftweb.net/url
      /organization
      licenses
        license
          nameApache License, Version 2.0/name
          urlhttp://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt/url
          distributionrepo/distribution
          commentsLift open source software is licensed under an Apache
  2.0 license./comments
        /license
      /licenses
      mailingLists
        mailingList
          nameUser and Developer Discussion List/name
          subscribeliftweb+subscr...@googlegroups.com/subscribe
          unsubscribeliftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com/unsubscribe
          postliftweb@googlegroups.com/post
          archivehttp://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/archive
        /mailingList
        mailingList
          nameCommitter Discussion List/name
          archivehttp://groups.google.com/group/lift-committers/
  archive
        /mailingList
        mailingList
          nameAnnouncement List/name
          subscribelift-announce+subscr...@googlegroups.com/subscribe
          unsubscribelift-announce+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com/
  unsubscribe
          archivehttp://groups.google.com/group/lift-announce/archive
        /mailingList
      /mailingLists
      developers
        developer
          iddpp/id
          nameDavid Pollak/name
          emaildpp [at] liftweb.net/email
          roles
            roleBDFL/role
            roleFeeder of the Bears/role
          /roles
          timezone-8/timezone
        /developer
        developer
          idBurak.Emir/id
          nameBurak Emir/name
        /developer
        developer
          idphilipp.schmidt/id
          namephilipp.schmidt/name
        /developer
        developer
          idcwilkes/id
          namecwilkes/name
        /developer
        developer
          idjulien.wetterwald/id
          namejulien.wetterwald/name
        /developer
        developer
          idleppoc/id
          nameleppoc/name
        /developer
        developer
          idstepan.koltsov/id
          namestepan.koltsov/name
        /developer
        developer
          idjorge.ortiz/id
          nameJorge Ortiz/name
          emailjorge [at] 

[Lift] Re: Lift 2.0 on Scala 2.8 update

2010-01-31 Thread Timothy Perrett
OK, so that really didn't help. How is it building OK on hudson?! That
makes no sense at all. I guess for the moment i'll just have to work
with the JARs built by hudson.

Cheers, Tim

On Jan 31, 8:44 pm, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.eu wrote:
 Im just doing a fresh clone and checkout to see if something was
 screwed in my local build.

 Cheers, Tim

 On Jan 31, 7:44 pm, Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.com wrote:



  I was suspecting Java 1.5 (if you were on 10.5). That's not the case. So
  I am completely stumped now.

  See if you can compare with the Hudson copy
  (http://hudson.scala-tools.org/view/Lift/job/lift-framework-scala280/)

  - IRC

  On 01/02/10 12:55 AM, Timothy Perrett wrote:

   macbookpro:lift-framework timperrett$ java -version
   java version 1.6.0_17
   Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_17-b04-248-10M3025)
   Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 14.3-b01-101, mixed mode)

   macbookpro:lift-framework timperrett$ mvn -version
   Apache Maven 2.2.1 (r801777; 2009-08-06 20:16:01+0100)
   Java version: 1.6.0_17
   Java home: /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.6.0/
   Home
   Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: MacRoman
   OS name: mac os x version: 10.6.2 arch: x86_64 Family: mac

   Cheers, Tim

   On Jan 31, 6:59 pm, Indrajit Raychaudhuriindraj...@gmail.com  wrote:
   Hmm, the effective pom is perfect! Something else somewhere.
   Are you on OSX 10.5 or 10.6?

   - IRC

   On 01/02/10 12:11 AM, Timothy Perrett wrote:

   I was puzzled because the deps looked fine ;)

   Here's the effective pom:

   ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
   !--
   ==
   --
   !--
   --
   !-- Generated by Maven Help Plugin on 1/31/10 6:40
   PM                      --
   !-- See:http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-help-plugin/
   --
   !--
   --
   !--
   ==
   --

   !--
   ==
   --
   !--
   --
   !-- Effective POM for
   project                                              --
   !-- 'net.liftweb:lift-common:jar:2.0-scala280-
   SNAPSHOT'                    --
   !--
   --
   !--
   ==
   --

   project xmlns=http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0; xmlns:xsi=http://
  www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance xsi:schemaLocation=http://
   maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd;
       modelVersion4.0.0/modelVersion
       parent
         artifactIdlift-base/artifactId
         groupIdnet.liftweb/groupId
         version2.0-scala280-SNAPSHOT/version
       /parent
       groupIdnet.liftweb/groupId
       artifactIdlift-common/artifactId
       version2.0-scala280-SNAPSHOT/version
       nameLift Common/name
       descriptionCommon Interfaces for Lift and perhaps other
   frameworks/description
       urlhttp://dev.liftweb.net/framework/lift-base/lift-common/url
       inceptionYear2006/inceptionYear
       organization
         nameWorldWide Conferencing, LLC/name
         urlhttp://www.liftweb.net/url
       /organization
       licenses
         license
           nameApache License, Version 2.0/name
           urlhttp://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt/url
           distributionrepo/distribution
           commentsLift open source software is licensed under an Apache
   2.0 license./comments
         /license
       /licenses
       mailingLists
         mailingList
           nameUser and Developer Discussion List/name
           subscribeliftweb+subscr...@googlegroups.com/subscribe
           unsubscribeliftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com/unsubscribe
           postliftweb@googlegroups.com/post
           archivehttp://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/archive
         /mailingList
         mailingList
           nameCommitter Discussion List/name
           archivehttp://groups.google.com/group/lift-committers/
   archive
         /mailingList
         mailingList
           nameAnnouncement List/name
           subscribelift-announce+subscr...@googlegroups.com/subscribe
           unsubscribelift-announce+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com/
   unsubscribe
           archivehttp://groups.google.com/group/lift-announce/archive
         /mailingList
       /mailingLists
       developers
         developer
           iddpp/id
           nameDavid Pollak/name
           emaildpp [at] liftweb.net/email
           roles
             roleBDFL/role
             roleFeeder of the Bears/role
           /roles
           timezone-8/timezone
         /developer
         developer
           idBurak.Emir/id
           nameBurak Emir/name
         /developer
         developer
           idphilipp.schmidt/id
           namephilipp.schmidt/name
         /developer
         developer
           idcwilkes/id
           namecwilkes/name
         /developer
         

Re: [Lift] Re: Lift 2.0 on Scala 2.8 update

2010-01-31 Thread David Pollak
The problem is that there's no ScalaCheck version for Scala 2.8.0 Beta1.
The Beta1-RC5 compilation of ScalaCheck was causing the wrong Scala
libraries to be loaded.

This is seriously suboptimal.

On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Timothy Perrett
timo...@getintheloop.euwrote:

 Im just doing a fresh clone and checkout to see if something was
 screwed in my local build.

 Cheers, Tim

 On Jan 31, 7:44 pm, Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.com wrote:
  I was suspecting Java 1.5 (if you were on 10.5). That's not the case. So
  I am completely stumped now.
 
  See if you can compare with the Hudson copy
  (http://hudson.scala-tools.org/view/Lift/job/lift-framework-scala280/)
 
  - IRC
 
  On 01/02/10 12:55 AM, Timothy Perrett wrote:
 
 
 
   macbookpro:lift-framework timperrett$ java -version
   java version 1.6.0_17
   Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_17-b04-248-10M3025)
   Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 14.3-b01-101, mixed mode)
 
   macbookpro:lift-framework timperrett$ mvn -version
   Apache Maven 2.2.1 (r801777; 2009-08-06 20:16:01+0100)
   Java version: 1.6.0_17
   Java home: /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.6.0/
   Home
   Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: MacRoman
   OS name: mac os x version: 10.6.2 arch: x86_64 Family: mac
 
   Cheers, Tim
 
   On Jan 31, 6:59 pm, Indrajit Raychaudhuriindraj...@gmail.com  wrote:
   Hmm, the effective pom is perfect! Something else somewhere.
   Are you on OSX 10.5 or 10.6?
 
   - IRC
 
   On 01/02/10 12:11 AM, Timothy Perrett wrote:
 
   I was puzzled because the deps looked fine ;)
 
   Here's the effective pom:
 
   ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
   !--
  
 ==
   --
   !--
   --
   !-- Generated by Maven Help Plugin on 1/31/10 6:40
   PM  --
   !-- See:http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-help-plugin/
   --
   !--
   --
   !--
  
 ==
   --
 
   !--
  
 ==
   --
   !--
   --
   !-- Effective POM for
   project  --
   !-- 'net.liftweb:lift-common:jar:2.0-scala280-
   SNAPSHOT'--
   !--
   --
   !--
  
 ==
   --
 
   project xmlns=http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0;
 xmlns:xsi=http://
  www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance xsi:schemaLocation=http://
  
 maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd;
   modelVersion4.0.0/modelVersion
   parent
 artifactIdlift-base/artifactId
 groupIdnet.liftweb/groupId
 version2.0-scala280-SNAPSHOT/version
   /parent
   groupIdnet.liftweb/groupId
   artifactIdlift-common/artifactId
   version2.0-scala280-SNAPSHOT/version
   nameLift Common/name
   descriptionCommon Interfaces for Lift and perhaps other
   frameworks/description
   urlhttp://dev.liftweb.net/framework/lift-base/lift-common
 /url
   inceptionYear2006/inceptionYear
   organization
 nameWorldWide Conferencing, LLC/name
 urlhttp://www.liftweb.net/url
   /organization
   licenses
 license
   nameApache License, Version 2.0/name
   urlhttp://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt/url
   distributionrepo/distribution
   commentsLift open source software is licensed under an
 Apache
   2.0 license./comments
 /license
   /licenses
   mailingLists
 mailingList
   nameUser and Developer Discussion List/name
   
   subscribeliftweb+subscr...@googlegroups.comliftweb%2bsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 /subscribe
   
   unsubscribeliftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comliftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 /unsubscribe
   postliftweb@googlegroups.com/post
   archivehttp://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/archive
 /mailingList
 mailingList
   nameCommitter Discussion List/name
   archivehttp://groups.google.com/group/lift-committers/
   archive
 /mailingList
 mailingList
   nameAnnouncement List/name
   
   subscribelift-announce+subscr...@googlegroups.comlift-announce%2bsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 /subscribe
   
   unsubscribelift-announce+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comlift-announce%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 /
   unsubscribe
   archivehttp://groups.google.com/group/lift-announce
 /archive
 /mailingList
   /mailingLists
   developers
 developer
   iddpp/id
   nameDavid Pollak/name
   emaildpp [at] liftweb.net/email
   roles
 roleBDFL/role
 roleFeeder of the Bears/role
   /roles
   timezone-8/timezone
 /developer
 developer
   idBurak.Emir/id
   nameBurak Emir/name

[Lift] Re: Lift 2.0 on Scala 2.8 update

2010-01-27 Thread Indrajit Raychaudhuri
Some more awesomeness - 280_port_refresh of Lift has moved to
Scala-2.8.0.Beta1.

Cheers, Indrajit


On Jan 26, 12:17 am, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Heiko Seeberger 

 heiko.seeber...@googlemail.com wrote:
  Awesome!

 Super Ultra Mega Awesome! :-)







  Heiko

  On Sunday, January 24, 2010, Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.com
  wrote:
   Folks,

   A quick update on Lift 2.0 build on Scala 2.8.

   Scala 2.8 port of Lift is available on the branch 280_port_refresh. This
  is a 'refresh'ed version of 280_port which is fully aligned and sync'ed with
  the master.

   To ensure minimal delta between the master and 280_port_refresh, the
  codebase in master has been adjusted considerably to improve Scala 2.8
  compatibility. Thus, the master branch continues to be on Scala 2.7.7 but is
  lot more Scala 2.8 friendly now. In fact, most of the modules (and all the
  examples) build cleanly on both 2.7 and 2.8 without any change.

   Few additional points:

   1. Those interested in playing with this branch can checkout from the
  280_port_refresh and build locally.

   2. A Hudson job for lift_280_refresh has been setup at
 http://hudson.scala-tools.org/view/Lift/job/lift-scala280/. For now, it
  just does internal build. In course of the week, Hudson would be setup to
  deploy the snapshots as well.

   3. Scala 2.8 is binary incompatible with Scala 2.7. This means the
  additional scala libraries on which Lift depends also need to provide a
  Scala 2.8 build. Hopefully, there would be scalajpa and scalamodules-core
  build available in near term. For now, modules specifically dependent on
  them have been disabled.

   4. Parts of the code which don't work on Scala 2.8 (broken, incompatible
  etc.) have been marked with FIXME: 280.

   Cheers, Indrajit

   --
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
  Lift group.
   To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
   To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comliftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
  
  .
   For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.

  --
  Heiko Seeberger

  Work: weiglewilczek.com
  Blog: heikoseeberger.name
  Follow me: twitter.com/hseeberger
  OSGi on Scala: scalamodules.org
  Lift, the simply functional web framework: liftweb.net

  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
  Lift group.
  To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comliftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
  
  .
  For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.

 --
 Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net
 Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
 Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp
 Surf the harmonics

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.



Re: [Lift] Re: Lift 2.0 on Scala 2.8 update

2010-01-27 Thread David Pollak
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri
indraj...@gmail.comwrote:

 Some more awesomeness - 280_port_refresh of Lift has moved to
 Scala-2.8.0.Beta1.



Booo YA!



 Cheers, Indrajit


 On Jan 26, 12:17 am, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Heiko Seeberger 
 
  heiko.seeber...@googlemail.com wrote:
   Awesome!
 
  Super Ultra Mega Awesome! :-)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   Heiko
 
   On Sunday, January 24, 2010, Indrajit Raychaudhuri 
 indraj...@gmail.com
   wrote:
Folks,
 
A quick update on Lift 2.0 build on Scala 2.8.
 
Scala 2.8 port of Lift is available on the branch 280_port_refresh.
 This
   is a 'refresh'ed version of 280_port which is fully aligned and sync'ed
 with
   the master.
 
To ensure minimal delta between the master and 280_port_refresh, the
   codebase in master has been adjusted considerably to improve Scala 2.8
   compatibility. Thus, the master branch continues to be on Scala 2.7.7
 but is
   lot more Scala 2.8 friendly now. In fact, most of the modules (and all
 the
   examples) build cleanly on both 2.7 and 2.8 without any change.
 
Few additional points:
 
1. Those interested in playing with this branch can checkout from the
   280_port_refresh and build locally.
 
2. A Hudson job for lift_280_refresh has been setup at
  http://hudson.scala-tools.org/view/Lift/job/lift-scala280/. For now, it
   just does internal build. In course of the week, Hudson would be setup
 to
   deploy the snapshots as well.
 
3. Scala 2.8 is binary incompatible with Scala 2.7. This means the
   additional scala libraries on which Lift depends also need to provide a
   Scala 2.8 build. Hopefully, there would be scalajpa and
 scalamodules-core
   build available in near term. For now, modules specifically dependent
 on
   them have been disabled.
 
4. Parts of the code which don't work on Scala 2.8 (broken,
 incompatible
   etc.) have been marked with FIXME: 280.
 
Cheers, Indrajit
 
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups
   Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
   liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comliftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 liftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.comliftweb%252bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
   .
For more options, visit this group at
  http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
 
   --
   Heiko Seeberger
 
   Work: weiglewilczek.com
   Blog: heikoseeberger.name
   Follow me: twitter.com/hseeberger
   OSGi on Scala: scalamodules.org
   Lift, the simply functional web framework: liftweb.net
 
   --
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups
   Lift group.
   To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
   To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
   liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comliftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 liftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.comliftweb%252bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
   .
   For more options, visit this group at
  http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
 
  --
  Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net
  Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
  Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp
  Surf the harmonics

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Lift group.
 To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comliftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 .
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.




-- 
Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
Surf the harmonics

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.



Re: [Lift] Re: Lift 2.0 on Scala 2.8 update

2010-01-27 Thread Jeppe Nejsum Madsen
Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.com writes:

 Some more awesomeness - 280_port_refresh of Lift has moved to
 Scala-2.8.0.Beta1.

 Cheers, Indrajit


Awesome. How much is supported?  Someone running anything substantial on
2.8 yet? I really (really!) want to ditch the 2.7 Eclipse plugin for
2.8

/Jeppe

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.



Re: [Lift] Re: Lift 2.0 on Scala 2.8 update

2010-01-27 Thread David Pollak
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen je...@ingolfs.dkwrote:

 Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.com writes:

  Some more awesomeness - 280_port_refresh of Lift has moved to
  Scala-2.8.0.Beta1.
 
  Cheers, Indrajit


 Awesome. How much is supported?


Right now, nothing... I'm working on fixing some issues and working around
compiler problems.


  Someone running anything substantial on
 2.8 yet? I really (really!) want to ditch the 2.7 Eclipse plugin for
 2.8

 /Jeppe

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Lift group.
 To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comliftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 .
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.




-- 
Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
Surf the harmonics

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.



[Lift] Re: Lift 2.0 on Scala 2.8 update

2010-01-26 Thread XiaomingZheng
i download the 280_port_refresh version code, and excuted mvn
install got a sucess.
but when i tried to run the examples/hellolift using jetty:run, i
visited the localhost:8080 and got a 404 error. can somebody tell me
how can make 280_port_refresh version work correct?

On Jan 25, 7:17 pm, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Heiko Seeberger 

 heiko.seeber...@googlemail.com wrote:
  Awesome!

 Super Ultra Mega Awesome! :-)





  Heiko

  On Sunday, January 24, 2010, Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.com
  wrote:
   Folks,

   A quick update on Lift 2.0 build on Scala 2.8.

   Scala 2.8 port of Lift is available on the branch 280_port_refresh. This
  is a 'refresh'ed version of 280_port which is fully aligned and sync'ed with
  the master.

   To ensure minimal delta between the master and 280_port_refresh, the
  codebase in master has been adjusted considerably to improve Scala 2.8
  compatibility. Thus, the master branch continues to be on Scala 2.7.7 but is
  lot more Scala 2.8 friendly now. In fact, most of the modules (and all the
  examples) build cleanly on both 2.7 and 2.8 without any change.

   Few additional points:

   1. Those interested in playing with this branch can checkout from the
  280_port_refresh and build locally.

   2. A Hudson job for lift_280_refresh has been setup at
 http://hudson.scala-tools.org/view/Lift/job/lift-scala280/. For now, it
  just does internal build. In course of the week, Hudson would be setup to
  deploy the snapshots as well.

   3. Scala 2.8 is binary incompatible with Scala 2.7. This means the
  additional scala libraries on which Lift depends also need to provide a
  Scala 2.8 build. Hopefully, there would be scalajpa and scalamodules-core
  build available in near term. For now, modules specifically dependent on
  them have been disabled.

   4. Parts of the code which don't work on Scala 2.8 (broken, incompatible
  etc.) have been marked with FIXME: 280.

   Cheers, Indrajit

   --
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
  Lift group.
   To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
   To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comliftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
  .
   For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.

  --
  Heiko Seeberger

  Work: weiglewilczek.com
  Blog: heikoseeberger.name
  Follow me: twitter.com/hseeberger
  OSGi on Scala: scalamodules.org
  Lift, the simply functional web framework: liftweb.net

  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
  Lift group.
  To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comliftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
  .
  For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.

 --
 Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net
 Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
 Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp
 Surf the harmonics

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.



Re: [Lift] Re: Lift 2.0 on Scala 2.8 update

2010-01-26 Thread David Pollak
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:53 AM, XiaomingZheng xiaomingzhen...@gmail.comwrote:

 i download the 280_port_refresh version code, and excuted mvn
 install got a sucess.
 but when i tried to run the examples/hellolift using jetty:run, i
 visited the localhost:8080 and got a 404 error. can somebody tell me
 how can make 280_port_refresh version work correct?


Until the Scala 2.8 Beta comes out and until Lift is actually building in
Maven and Lift/Scala 2.8 JARs are available in the scala-tools.org Maven
repository, we're not providing support.



 On Jan 25, 7:17 pm, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Heiko Seeberger 
 
  heiko.seeber...@googlemail.com wrote:
   Awesome!
 
  Super Ultra Mega Awesome! :-)
 
 
 
 
 
   Heiko
 
   On Sunday, January 24, 2010, Indrajit Raychaudhuri 
 indraj...@gmail.com
   wrote:
Folks,
 
A quick update on Lift 2.0 build on Scala 2.8.
 
Scala 2.8 port of Lift is available on the branch 280_port_refresh.
 This
   is a 'refresh'ed version of 280_port which is fully aligned and sync'ed
 with
   the master.
 
To ensure minimal delta between the master and 280_port_refresh, the
   codebase in master has been adjusted considerably to improve Scala 2.8
   compatibility. Thus, the master branch continues to be on Scala 2.7.7
 but is
   lot more Scala 2.8 friendly now. In fact, most of the modules (and all
 the
   examples) build cleanly on both 2.7 and 2.8 without any change.
 
Few additional points:
 
1. Those interested in playing with this branch can checkout from the
   280_port_refresh and build locally.
 
2. A Hudson job for lift_280_refresh has been setup at
  http://hudson.scala-tools.org/view/Lift/job/lift-scala280/. For now, it
   just does internal build. In course of the week, Hudson would be setup
 to
   deploy the snapshots as well.
 
3. Scala 2.8 is binary incompatible with Scala 2.7. This means the
   additional scala libraries on which Lift depends also need to provide a
   Scala 2.8 build. Hopefully, there would be scalajpa and
 scalamodules-core
   build available in near term. For now, modules specifically dependent
 on
   them have been disabled.
 
4. Parts of the code which don't work on Scala 2.8 (broken,
 incompatible
   etc.) have been marked with FIXME: 280.
 
Cheers, Indrajit
 
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups
   Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
   liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comliftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 liftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.comliftweb%252bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 
   .
For more options, visit this group at
  http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
 
   --
   Heiko Seeberger
 
   Work: weiglewilczek.com
   Blog: heikoseeberger.name
   Follow me: twitter.com/hseeberger
   OSGi on Scala: scalamodules.org
   Lift, the simply functional web framework: liftweb.net
 
   --
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups
   Lift group.
   To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
   To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
   liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comliftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 liftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.comliftweb%252bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 
   .
   For more options, visit this group at
  http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
 
  --
  Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net
  Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
  Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp
  Surf the harmonics

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Lift group.
 To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comliftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 .
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.




-- 
Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
Surf the harmonics

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.



Re: [Lift] Re: Lift 2.0 on Scala 2.8 update

2010-01-26 Thread Naftoli Gugenheim
Did you see any error in the console?

-
XiaomingZhengxiaomingzhen...@gmail.com wrote:

i download the 280_port_refresh version code, and excuted mvn
install got a sucess.
but when i tried to run the examples/hellolift using jetty:run, i
visited the localhost:8080 and got a 404 error. can somebody tell me
how can make 280_port_refresh version work correct?

On Jan 25, 7:17 pm, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Heiko Seeberger 

 heiko.seeber...@googlemail.com wrote:
  Awesome!

 Super Ultra Mega Awesome! :-)





  Heiko

  On Sunday, January 24, 2010, Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.com
  wrote:
   Folks,

   A quick update on Lift 2.0 build on Scala 2.8.

   Scala 2.8 port of Lift is available on the branch 280_port_refresh. This
  is a 'refresh'ed version of 280_port which is fully aligned and sync'ed with
  the master.

   To ensure minimal delta between the master and 280_port_refresh, the
  codebase in master has been adjusted considerably to improve Scala 2.8
  compatibility. Thus, the master branch continues to be on Scala 2.7.7 but is
  lot more Scala 2.8 friendly now. In fact, most of the modules (and all the
  examples) build cleanly on both 2.7 and 2.8 without any change.

   Few additional points:

   1. Those interested in playing with this branch can checkout from the
  280_port_refresh and build locally.

   2. A Hudson job for lift_280_refresh has been setup at
 http://hudson.scala-tools.org/view/Lift/job/lift-scala280/. For now, it
  just does internal build. In course of the week, Hudson would be setup to
  deploy the snapshots as well.

   3. Scala 2.8 is binary incompatible with Scala 2.7. This means the
  additional scala libraries on which Lift depends also need to provide a
  Scala 2.8 build. Hopefully, there would be scalajpa and scalamodules-core
  build available in near term. For now, modules specifically dependent on
  them have been disabled.

   4. Parts of the code which don't work on Scala 2.8 (broken, incompatible
  etc.) have been marked with FIXME: 280.

   Cheers, Indrajit

   --
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
  Lift group.
   To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
   To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comliftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
  .
   For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.

  --
  Heiko Seeberger

  Work: weiglewilczek.com
  Blog: heikoseeberger.name
  Follow me: twitter.com/hseeberger
  OSGi on Scala: scalamodules.org
  Lift, the simply functional web framework: liftweb.net

  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
  Lift group.
  To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comliftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
  .
  For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.

 --
 Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net
 Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
 Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp
 Surf the harmonics

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.



[Lift] Re: Lift 2.0 on Scala 2.8 update

2010-01-24 Thread aw

On Jan 24, 10:47 am, Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.com
wrote:
 To ensure minimal delta between the master and 280_port_refresh, the
 codebase in master has been adjusted considerably to improve Scala 2.8
 compatibility. Thus, the master branch continues to be on Scala 2.7.7
 but is lot more Scala 2.8 friendly now. In fact, most of the modules
 (and all the examples) build cleanly on both 2.7 and 2.8 without any change.

Is a summary of these changes being maintained somewhere?  (Like the
wiki?)  Because I, and I'm sure other Lifters, would be interested in
making our code more 2.8 friendly without sacrificing 2.7
compatibility to ease our eventual migration.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.



[Lift] Re: Lift 2.0 on Scala 2.8 update

2010-01-24 Thread Indrajit Raychaudhuri
Never mind, seems to be solved now.
In fact, quite often Maven users fall over this on OSX. I used to keep
JAVA_HOME set in ~/.profile in 10.5 for this reason.

Cheers, Indrajit

On Jan 25, 10:20 am, Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.com
wrote:
 David,

 I tested it on OSX 10.6. Can you try with Java 6 first? You'd need to
 set JAVA_HOME explicitly in OSX 10.5.

 Additionally, Is your local folder location clean? The directory
 structure in 280_port and 280_port_refresh are quite different. You
 might want to do mvn clean in one branch before moving to the other.

 Cheers, Indrajit

 On 25/01/10 8:30 AM, David Brooks wrote:



  Great!!

  However I'm getting test failures when building:

      Tests in error:
      A Full Box should define a 'filterMsg' method, returning a Failure
      if the filter predicate is not satisfied
      An Empty Box should define a 'filterMsg' method, returning a Failure
      A Failure is an Empty Box which can return its cause as an exception
      A Failure is an Empty Box which can return a chained list of causes
      A Failure is an Empty Box which should create a new failure with a
      chained message if asked for its status with the operator ?~!

  each due to the exception of:

      java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: java.lang.String.isEmpty()Z

  This is under OS/X 10.5, trying both Java 5 and Java 6. I've had no
  problems building the original 280_port branch.

  Thanks,

  Dave

  On 25/01/10 7:47 AM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri wrote:
  Folks,

  A quick update on Lift 2.0 build on Scala 2.8.

  Scala 2.8 port of Lift is available on the branch 280_port_refresh.
  This is a 'refresh'ed version of 280_port which is fully aligned and
  sync'ed with the master.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.