[Lift] Re: Lift Record Field

2008-11-16 Thread Marius
On Nov 16, 1:32 am, Tim Perrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: wow this is super sweet marius! A couple of questions: - net.liftweb.record.Test... shouldn't this be in the tests package? I'll remove this. My bad. - DBRecord, whats the difference between this and ordinary record? DBRecord is

[Lift] Re: Lift Record Field

2008-11-16 Thread Marius
On Nov 16, 2:29 am, Derek Chen-Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's funny, I just checked out the wip-record2-dpp branch this morning to start looking at it :) So far, I really like what I see. I would agree with Tim on calling it Persistable... vs DB... but otherwise it's looking very

[Lift] Re: Lift Record Field

2008-11-15 Thread Tim Perrett
wow this is super sweet marius! A couple of questions: - net.liftweb.record.Test... shouldn't this be in the tests package? - DBRecord, whats the difference between this and ordinary record? Looking at the code, it appears that DBRecord just adds some abstract stuff like stubbs for save methods

[Lift] Re: Lift Record Field

2008-11-15 Thread Derek Chen-Becker
That's funny, I just checked out the wip-record2-dpp branch this morning to start looking at it :) So far, I really like what I see. I would agree with Tim on calling it Persistable... vs DB... but otherwise it's looking very good. If I have some time this week I might start looking at how to meld