[Lift] Re: Mapper Decimal, PostgreSQL, and foreign keys issues

2009-08-10 Thread Derek Chen-Becker
I can take care of #1 and #3 if you can open issues for them on GitHub. If you could attach a standalone project for #3 that I can test against that would be very helpful. Derby has some other not so fun quirks with types (BINARY support sucks), so I wouldn't be surprised if there's something

[Lift] Re: Mapper Decimal, PostgreSQL, and foreign keys issues

2009-08-10 Thread Kyle Goodwin
I'm not aware of any database that doesn't support DECIMAL under that name however all the other Mapped types specify their type names in the DriverType declarations including things that never vary between drivers, so I just figured that was the right place for it. It doesn't matter

[Lift] Re: Mapper Decimal, PostgreSQL, and foreign keys issues

2009-08-10 Thread Derek Chen-Becker
Thanks. I agree that it would be better to put that kind of thing in DriverTypes, but I wanted to check to make sure that there weren't any exceptions that I should specialize when I do put it in place. Derek On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Kyle Goodwin goodw...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not