Jeppe,
as far as I know this can be handled by setting the scope for slf4j-
log4j to 'test' and for logback-classic to compile.
Or am I missing your point.
What do you mean with generated POM dependencies in 3?
Cheers
Nico Tromp
On Feb 26, 9:55 am, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen je...@ingolfs.dk wrote:
In addition to specifying the scope of test or compile does
optionaltrue/optional help with what you want?
On Feb 26, 3:55 am, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen je...@ingolfs.dk wrote:
Hi,
For the new logging code I need a setup that I can't really see how to
achieve with Maven:
1) Both slf4j-log4j and
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Steve Swing steve.sw...@gmail.com wrote:
In addition to specifying the scope of test or compile does
optionaltrue/optional help with what you want?
Yes, I think optional can help with the third point.
/Jeppe
--
You received this message because you are
