Oliver Lambert writes:
[...]
> No this isn't what I'm suggesting, I don't think MappedEnum should be made
> flexible.
I know this wasn't your suggestion, but any reason not to make
MappedEnum flexible (if possible and backwards compatibility could be
maintained) ?
> I was thinking perhaps y
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Oliver Lambert
> wrote:
> >
> > Looks very nice.
> >
> > One thing I'm wondering, what if I wanted the displayed value outside of
> the mapper, such as TestTypes.Item1.displayValue. Would you use an
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Oliver Lambert wrote:
>
> Looks very nice.
>
> One thing I'm wondering, what if I wanted the displayed value outside of the
> mapper, such as TestTypes.Item1.displayValue. Would you use an implicit
> conversion to provide this or is the
> display value conceptua
Looks very nice.
One thing I'm wondering, what if I wanted the displayed value outside of the
mapper, such as TestTypes.Item1.displayValue. Would you use an implicit
conversion to provide this or is the
display value conceptually always part of a mapper object.
I have a rough implementation calle
