[Lift] Re: Parcing Json

2010-01-14 Thread Randinn
Ah, I didn't know I was missing that. Right, I'll go back to chapter 6 in the book and see how to accomplish that, thank you for the info. On Jan 15, 9:43 am, David Pollak wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Randinn wrote: > >http://paste.pocoo.org/show/165532/ > > You have to write code t

Re: [Lift] Re: Parcing Json

2010-01-14 Thread David Pollak
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Randinn wrote: > http://paste.pocoo.org/show/165532/ > You have to write code that will copy each of the fields from the case class to the mapper object. > > On Jan 15, 9:29 am, David Pollak > wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Randinn wrote: > > > T

[Lift] Re: Parcing Json

2010-01-14 Thread Randinn
http://paste.pocoo.org/show/165532/ On Jan 15, 9:29 am, David Pollak wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Randinn wrote: > > Thank you both for your explanations it seems assigning val > > Observation to Observe is a bad idea, what should I do to get the > > parced information to the Observ

Re: [Lift] Re: Parcing Json

2010-01-14 Thread David Pollak
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Randinn wrote: > Thank you both for your explanations it seems assigning val > Observation to Observe is a bad idea, what should I do to get the > parced information to the Observation map? > What does your Observation class look like? > > On Jan 15, 8:42 am, R

[Lift] Re: Parcing Json

2010-01-14 Thread Randinn
Thank you both for your explanations it seems assigning val Observation to Observe is a bad idea, what should I do to get the parced information to the Observation map? On Jan 15, 8:42 am, Ross Mellgren wrote: > Isn't it that the val Observation is being assigned to the (compiler > synthesized)

Re: [Lift] Re: Parcing Json

2010-01-14 Thread Ross Mellgren
Isn't it that the val Observation is being assigned to the (compiler synthesized) Observe singleton object? In either case, no save method. -Ross On Jan 14, 2010, at 4:41 PM, David Pollak wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Randinn wrote: > Well here is the latest iteration of the

Re: [Lift] Re: Parcing Json

2010-01-14 Thread David Pollak
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Randinn wrote: > Well here is the latest iteration of the code: > > http://paste.pocoo.org/show/165511/ > > but I'm getting this error > > Compiling 11 source files to C:\Users\Randin\Documents\Development > \weather\target\classes at 1263504637934 > [ERROR]weathe

[Lift] Re: Parcing Json

2010-01-14 Thread Randinn
Well here is the latest iteration of the code: http://paste.pocoo.org/show/165511/ but I'm getting this error Compiling 11 source files to C:\Users\Randin\Documents\Development \weather\target\classes at 1263504637934 [ERROR]weather/snippet/HelloWorld.scala:32: error: value save is not a member

[Lift] Re: Parcing Json

2010-01-13 Thread Randinn
I assume I use the save method but am stumbling on implementing it... On Jan 11, 5:49 pm, Joni Freeman wrote: > Hi, > > I'm sorry but I'm not totally sure what you are trying to accomplish. > What would be the key in that map and what would be its values? > > Cheers Joni > > On 11 tammi, 03:14, R

Re: [Lift] Re: Parcing Json

2010-01-11 Thread Timothy Perrett
Yeah i've been watching it for a while; not that there is anything wrong with mapper / jpa, but ScalaQuery appears to be a more functional design and the whole "its not an ORM" thing that is favoured by quite a number of people makes it very interesting indeed. Cheers, Tim On 11 Jan 2010, at

[Lift] Re: Parcing Json

2010-01-11 Thread Joni Freeman
Tim, ScalaQuery is a great DSL to interface relational database and to construct type safe SQL queries. I find that kind of approach often preferable compared to full blown ORMs (like Hibernate etc.) since it gives full control over SQL queries and does not impose any constraints on object model.

Re: [Lift] Re: Parcing Json

2010-01-11 Thread Timothy Perrett
Hey Joni, What did you think of ScalaQuery btw? Have you used it inside a lift app? Cheers, Tim On 11 Jan 2010, at 11:07, Joni Freeman wrote: > Ok, thanks for clarification. Unfortunately my knowledge about mapper > is very limited (I've previously used ScalaQuery for db persistence). > Maybe s

[Lift] Re: Parcing Json

2010-01-11 Thread Joni Freeman
Ok, thanks for clarification. Unfortunately my knowledge about mapper is very limited (I've previously used ScalaQuery for db persistence). Maybe someone else can answer the question better, the question being: What is the easiest way to store instances of Observations into database using mapper.

[Lift] Re: Parcing Json

2010-01-11 Thread Randinn
Sorry for the confusion Observation is a table actually, I meant to write mapper. So what we're doing is calling up the json file, making it a string, putting it through the parcer and inserting it into the table. On Jan 11, 5:49 pm, Joni Freeman wrote: > Hi, > > I'm sorry but I'm not totally sur

[Lift] Re: Parcing Json

2010-01-10 Thread Joni Freeman
Hi, I'm sorry but I'm not totally sure what you are trying to accomplish. What would be the key in that map and what would be its values? Cheers Joni On 11 tammi, 03:14, Randinn wrote: > I should explain what we are planning, the idea is to get the json > file into a string, parse it and save t

[Lift] Re: Parcing Json

2010-01-10 Thread Randinn
I should explain what we are planning, the idea is to get the json file into a string, parse it and save the caught information into a Observation map. On Jan 11, 11:23 am, Randinn wrote: > Forgive my ignorance but I was wondering why (json \ > "observations").extract[Observation], is it to save

[Lift] Re: Parcing Json

2010-01-10 Thread Randinn
Forgive my ignorance but I was wondering why (json \ "observations").extract[Observation], is it to save as a flat file? On Jan 4, 7:13 am, Randinn wrote: > I tried some of the changes you made but not all of them, and (json\ > "observations").extract[Observation], I had no idea about that one. >

[Lift] Re: Parcing Json

2010-01-03 Thread Randinn
I tried some of the changes you made but not all of them, and (json \ "observations").extract[Observation], I had no idea about that one. Thank you very much for your help, it is appreciated. On Jan 4, 1:00 am, Joni Freeman wrote: > Google Groups does not shine in formatting code snippets. Here's

[Lift] Re: Parcing Json

2010-01-03 Thread Joni Freeman
Google Groups does not shine in formatting code snippets. Here's nicer version: http://paste.pocoo.org/show/161578/ Cheers Joni On 3 tammi, 12:20, Joni Freeman wrote: > Hi, > > That's almost correct. I did following changes after looking into JSON > content. > > 1. 'notice' and 'header' are JSO

[Lift] Re: Parcing Json

2010-01-03 Thread Joni Freeman
Hi, That's almost correct. I did following changes after looking into JSON content. 1. 'notice' and 'header' are JSON arrays just like 'data'. Therefore: case class Observation(notice: List[Notice], header: List[Header], data: List[Data]) 2. There's optional data in JSON (some datapoints are nul