[Lift] Re: Record is the default db interface in the Lift1.1 ?

2009-10-21 Thread Timothy Perrett
Neil, Record is not yet the default - please use mapper unless you want a custom backend for some other (non-rdbms) service. Cheers, Tim On 21 Oct 2009, at 08:42, Neil.Lv wrote: Hi all, Record is the default db interface in the Lift1.1 ? Is there anybody who know some examples about

[Lift] Re: Record is the default db interface in the Lift1.1 ?

2009-10-21 Thread Jeppe Nejsum Madsen
Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.eu writes: Neil, Record is not yet the default - please use mapper unless you want a custom backend for some other (non-rdbms) service. Any timeframe for the rdbms backend? /Jeppe --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received

[Lift] Re: Record is the default db interface in the Lift1.1 ?

2009-10-21 Thread David Pollak
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen je...@ingolfs.dkwrote: Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.eu writes: Neil, Record is not yet the default - please use mapper unless you want a custom backend for some other (non-rdbms) service. Any timeframe for the rdbms

[Lift] Re: Record is the default db interface in the Lift1.1 ?

2009-10-21 Thread Jeppe Nejsum Madsen
David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com writes: On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen je...@ingolfs.dkwrote: Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.eu writes: Neil, Record is not yet the default - please use mapper unless you want a custom backend for some other