Inlined
2009/12/19 Marius marius.dan...@gmail.com
If I may a few notes:
Syntactically it doesn't seem to me that there are much differences
between this and the initial proposal. Probably the most noticeable
diffs are in algebraic expressions like
Var(y) := (2:Expr) * x * 2
which
If I may a few notes:
Syntactically it doesn't seem to me that there are much differences
between this and the initial proposal. Probably the most noticeable
diffs are in algebraic expressions like
Var(y) := (2:Expr) * x * 2
which probably looks more appealing than
Var(y) := 2 __* x __* 2
The
I think I'm nearly there (that is a working equivalent of your sample) with
G-d's help...
-
Mariusmarius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
Let me know when you have something.
Br's,
Marius
On Dec 17, 8:58 am, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm
Current state attached.
2009/12/17 Marius marius.dan...@gmail.com
Let me know when you have something.
Br's,
Marius
On Dec 17, 8:58 am, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm thinking of an approach to writing a DSL with a much cleaner syntax.
I'll try to put something
Okay!
The following code:
val jsFunc: JSFunc = Function(myFunc)(param1, param2) {case
param1 :: param2 :: Nil =
Var(someArray) := Array(1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
If(param1 30) {
val x = Var(x) // now we can use either x or 'x
x := (234 - 3) / 2
I like the source for the DSL very much, I think it's very well written. Thanks
for sharing it.
-Ross
On Dec 17, 2009, at 9:34 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim wrote:
Okay!
The following code:
val jsFunc: JSFunc = Function(myFunc)(param1, param2) {case param1
:: param2 :: Nil =
You're welcome. There's still some work to do; I would call it a proof of
concept. But I'll let Marius finish it up. :)
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Ross Mellgren dri...@gmail.com wrote:
I like the source for the DSL very much, I think it's very well written.
Thanks for sharing it.
Let me know when you have something.
Br's,
Marius
On Dec 17, 8:58 am, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm thinking of an approach to writing a DSL with a much cleaner syntax. I'll
try to put something together.
-
Marius
Other advantages of a DSL include type safety and typo safety. :)
-
Mariusmarius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
That is certainly one way to go but personally I'm not at all a fan of
this string literals approach,. For instance if Scala would not have
had built in
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Marius marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
That is certainly one way to go but personally I'm not at all a fan of
this string literals approach,. For instance if Scala would not have
had built in XML support using XML as string literals Lift would
probably loose
On Dec 14, 4:54 am, Alex Boisvert alex.boisv...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Marius marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
That is certainly one way to go but personally I'm not at all a fan of
this string literals approach,. For instance if Scala would not have
had built in
My notes inline.
On Dec 12, 12:34 pm, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.eu wrote:
Hey Marius,
Within this DSL will you be using JsObj under the hood or lift-json?
I was thinking to use lift-json in this case ... but I'd also of
prefer having a lift-js project.
I would be very reluctant
On 12/12/09 4:39 PM, Marius wrote:
My notes inline.
On Dec 12, 12:34 pm, Timothy Perretttimo...@getintheloop.eu wrote:
Hey Marius,
Within this DSL will you be using JsObj under the hood or lift-json?
I was thinking to use lift-json in this case ... but I'd also of
prefer having a
I agree. Although to be more specific I guess my proposal can be split
in 2:
1. The syntax style proposed that would probably evolve depending on
the feedback.
2. The existence of lift-js project.
Br's,
Marius
On Dec 12, 6:44 pm, Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/12/09
That is certainly one way to go but personally I'm not at all a fan of
this string literals approach,. For instance if Scala would not have
had built in XML support using XML as string literals Lift would
probably loose some of its attractions... but that's my opinion.
Furthermore a DSL like
15 matches
Mail list logo
