[Lift] Re: Thread safe configuration without abusing the session?
If the config is on a per-session basis, then SessionVar should be the way to go. But of course, put it in _one_ SessionVar, and not hundreds... :) On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Tim Perrett timo...@getintheloop.eu wrote: Guys, Im working on a system where by there is a bunch of configuration options that should exist for a given application, and are application wide... Im handling this right now in a similar way to LiftRules. However, I also have some configuration that can be done on a per user / per session basis - what is the recommended strategy for handling this without simply abusing the crap out of SessionVar? Cheers, Tim -- Viktor Klang Senior Systems Analyst --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Lift] Re: Thread safe configuration without abusing the session?
Hey Viktor :) What¹s the overhead associated with this? Little? Much? Cheers, Tim On 06/04/2009 13:17, Viktor Klang viktor.kl...@gmail.com wrote: If the config is on a per-session basis, then SessionVar should be the way to go. But of course, put it in _one_ SessionVar, and not hundreds... :) On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Tim Perrett timo...@getintheloop.eu wrote: Guys, Im working on a system where by there is a bunch of configuration options that should exist for a given application, and are application wide... Im handling this right now in a similar way to LiftRules. However, I also have some configuration that can be done on a per user / per session basis - what is the recommended strategy for handling this without simply abusing the crap out of SessionVar? Cheers, Tim --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Lift] Re: Thread safe configuration without abusing the session?
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.euwrote: Hey Viktor :) What’s the overhead associated with this? Little? Much? The overhead of many SessionVars version one? From a memory/cpu-perspective it's negligible (dang, how to spell that?). However, from a developer-perspective, it's far easier to keep the data consistent if you put it in a data structure of it's own (In the future, you might wish to persist it, and then the work is almost all done.). Cheers, Viktor Cheers, Tim On 06/04/2009 13:17, Viktor Klang viktor.kl...@gmail.com wrote: If the config is on a per-session basis, then SessionVar should be the way to go. But of course, put it in _one_ SessionVar, and not hundreds... :) On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Tim Perrett timo...@getintheloop.eu wrote: Guys, Im working on a system where by there is a bunch of configuration options that should exist for a given application, and are application wide... Im handling this right now in a similar way to LiftRules. However, I also have some configuration that can be done on a per user / per session basis - what is the recommended strategy for handling this without simply abusing the crap out of SessionVar? Cheers, Tim -- Viktor Klang Senior Systems Analyst --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
