BTW ... there were previous discussions that for 1.1 we'll deprecate
lift:bind, right? ... if so with-param would also be deprecated ... or
am I missing something?
Br's,
Marius
On Apr 27, 1:05 am, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.eu wrote:
Things changed with this code 2 days ago...
Ah right, so your thinking that lift:bind will go, and be replaced with
something similar that uses our existing snippet infrastructure?
Cheers, Tim
On 27/04/2009 07:28, marius d. marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW ... there were previous discussions that for 1.1 we'll deprecate
lift:bind,
Right now: bits me ... perhaps Dave has more input. However it seems
to me that what we can do with lift:bind/lift:with-param today, it
can be easily done without it using the other Lift artifacts. Still
probably people got used with lift:bind style and finds this pretty
handy?
Br's,
Marius
On
Can you be specific about which other lift artefacts you want to replace
lift:bind with? Im not fighting lift:binds corner or anything, rather, just
interested to know what will supersede it because this kind of functionality
is key in our template strategy.
Cheers, Tim
On 27/04/2009 10:13,
I'm not referring to something similar to lift:bind. Just that using
snippets or Loc snippets, chooseTemplate etc. gives you the ability to
to change content depending on what page you are which is with-param
kind of does.
No worries, these are valid question and to me it kind of boils down
to
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:25 AM, marius d. marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not referring to something similar to lift:bind. Just that using
snippets or Loc snippets, chooseTemplate etc. gives you the ability to
to change content depending on what page you are which is with-param
kind of
I could implement this soon if you are too busy. Just let me know.
Br's,
Marius
On Apr 27, 10:37 pm, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:33 PM, marius d. marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
Good ... well then shouldn't the same rationale be applied for
Go for it!
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:53 PM, marius d. marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
I could implement this soon if you are too busy. Just let me know.
Br's,
Marius
On Apr 27, 10:37 pm, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:33 PM, marius d.
Sounds great gents! Looking forward to the update.
Cheers, Tim
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this
Can't it just be bind:point name=name/?
David Pollak wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:25 AM, marius d. marius.dan...@gmail.com
mailto:marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not referring to something similar to lift:bind. Just that using
snippets or Loc snippets, chooseTemplate
Things changed with this code 2 days ago... independent of the 2.7.4 update.
Marius moved the various lift:xxx / tags into snippets.
Yeah I realized that once I trawled the commits.
I think he checked in a fix a few minutes ago.
Indeed he has and its now working once more.
Cheers, Tim
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Timothy Perrett
timo...@getintheloop.euwrote:
Guys,
Just pulled the latest lift codebase and finding that an existing
project im working on now has problems with the syntax:
lift:with-param name=top_image
.
/lift:with-param
I see this on the
12 matches
Mail list logo
