That is great for lift 1.1. but I suggest to improve doc.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group,
Hi David,
That sounds like a great list, especially (in my case) the Record,
lift-json, OAuth, and REST support.
Peter Robinett
On Oct 14, 11:27 pm, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
Folks,
I'd like to get everyone's input on what Lift 1.1 will contain. Here's my
list:
Being able to unit test record/mapper classes and the code that depends on
them would be wonderful.
Cheers
Jono
2009/10/15 David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Timothy Perrett
timo...@getintheloop.euwrote:
Agreed on all fronts. Points 1 - 4 are
Will REST support include integrated JAX-RS and JAXB? Or are you
planning to not use those existing stacks and replace them with
something Scala/Lift-specific?
I personally like both of them as they take care of a lot of plumbing
transparently (.e.g. switching output from JSON to XML depending
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:08 AM, Jacek Furmankiewicz jace...@gmail.comwrote:
Will REST support include integrated JAX-RS and JAXB? Or are you
planning to not use those existing stacks and replace them with
something Scala/Lift-specific?
This thread is the discussion of the what is going to
Agreed on all fronts. Points 1 - 4 are pretty key for me and the
projects that run on lift at work.
So, the million dollar question: ETA's of this stuff? Scala 2.8.2
(based on our previous conversation about not using 2.8.0) is still
some time off right?
Cheers, Tim
On 14 Oct 2009, at
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.euwrote:
Agreed on all fronts. Points 1 - 4 are pretty key for me and the projects
that run on lift at work.
So, the million dollar question: ETA's of this stuff? Scala 2.8.2 (based on
our previous conversation about not
