[Lift] Re: You guys rock!

2009-03-11 Thread David Pollak
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:49 AM, Alex Boisvert boisv...@intalio.com wrote: Between Scala and Lift, ScalaCheck and Specs, Eclipse and Buildr, Jetty and JavaRebel, it's amazing to see how far the tools have evolved in the 2 years I've been following Scala. I had my epiphany today while

[Lift] Re: You guys rock!

2009-03-11 Thread etorreborre
Hi Alex, Knowing that you can write specs which can be run as JUnit tests, can't the continuous testing plugin in Eclipse work with that? Or would you like something simple like autotest in Ruby which polls the modified files regularly and executes the tests in the console if any file is

[Lift] Re: You guys rock!

2009-03-11 Thread David Bernard
About naming convention of test, I used : class XxxxSpecTest extends org.specs.runner.JUnit4(XxxxSpec) import org.specs._ object XxxxSpec extends Specification with ScalaCheck { About file roller, I could modify the maven:cc to add an option that rerun every test on change but I thing it

[Lift] Re: You guys rock!

2009-03-11 Thread Alex Boisvert
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 1:55 AM, etorreborre etorrebo...@gmail.com wrote: Knowing that you can write specs which can be run as JUnit tests, can't the continuous testing plugin in Eclipse work with that? I'm using Eclipse 3.4 and neither ct-eclipse nor the MIT continuous testing tools seem to

[Lift] Re: You guys rock!

2009-03-11 Thread Alex Boisvert
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Raoul Duke rao...@gmail.com wrote: Between Scala and Lift, ScalaCheck and Specs, Eclipse and Buildr, Jetty and JavaRebel, it's amazing to see how far the tools have evolved in the 2 years I've been following Scala. so... any good concise instructions on

[Lift] Re: You guys rock!

2009-03-11 Thread Dano
Late to the party here, but I would second the request for Alex's writeup of his dev environment formula. A link reference would be most appreciated. Thanks very much. Dan On Mar 11, 9:38 am, Alex Boisvert boisv...@intalio.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Raoul Duke