[Lift] Re: lift jetty configuration question

2009-02-12 Thread Charles F. Munat
Good to know. David Pollak wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Charles F. Munat > wrote: > > > Is this true for Google Chrome, too? (Probably, although each tab is a > wholly separate process, I hear.) > > > They share cookies between the processes

[Lift] Re: lift jetty configuration question

2009-02-12 Thread David Pollak
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Charles F. Munat wrote: > > Is this true for Google Chrome, too? (Probably, although each tab is a > wholly separate process, I hear.) > They share cookies between the processes unless you're browsing "Incognito." > > Chas. > > David Pollak wrote: > > > > > >

[Lift] Re: lift jetty configuration question

2009-02-12 Thread Charles F. Munat
Is this true for Google Chrome, too? (Probably, although each tab is a wholly separate process, I hear.) Chas. David Pollak wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Meredith Gregory > mailto:lgreg.mered...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > David, > > This is merely demoware -- nothing de

[Lift] Re: lift jetty configuration question

2009-02-12 Thread Meredith Gregory
Tim, That's a great idea. That's exactly what i want to do. Now, we're back to my initial report. Whoops! i must have used Firefox for both localhost requests before. If i use FF and Safari i get the behavior i wanted. Nevermind. ;-( Best wishes, --greg On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Tim Perr

[Lift] Re: lift jetty configuration question

2009-02-12 Thread David Pollak
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Meredith Gregory wrote: > David, > > This is merely demoware -- nothing deployable. i simply need the following > behavior > >- get http://localhost:8080 provides a login page (always) >- login sets up the session so that subsequent req's of the form >h

[Lift] Re: lift jetty configuration question

2009-02-12 Thread Tim Perrett
This might be a stupid suggestion, but cant you just use two different browsers to be logged in with two users at the same time? Im guessing you want to demo some kind of comet behavior or similar between two users? Tim On Feb 12, 5:25 pm, Meredith Gregory wrote: > David, > > This is merely de

[Lift] Re: lift jetty configuration question

2009-02-12 Thread Meredith Gregory
David, This is merely demoware -- nothing deployable. i simply need the following behavior - get http://localhost:8080 provides a login page (always) - login sets up the session so that subsequent req's of the form http://localhost:8080/mumble-with-session-info provide access to that

[Lift] Re: lift jetty configuration question

2009-02-12 Thread David Pollak
Greg, If each HTTP request to localhost had a new session, what would happen when you log in? If you can tell me a little more about your use case, I'll work on a solution. Thanks, David On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Meredith Gregory wrote: > Tim, > > Essentially, i want every request for

[Lift] Re: lift jetty configuration question

2009-02-12 Thread Meredith Gregory
Tim, Essentially, i want every request for http://localhost:8080 to start up a new session. This should force login each time. Best wishes, --greg On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 3:30 AM, Tim Perrett wrote: > > Can you clarify what you mean by "instance"? You mean run jetty on > another TCP port othe

[Lift] Re: lift jetty configuration question

2009-02-12 Thread Tim Perrett
Can you clarify what you mean by "instance"? You mean run jetty on another TCP port other than 8080? And by other browser do you mean two seperate apps (like firefox and safari) or just two seperate windows in the same app? Cheers Tim On Feb 12, 2:27 am, Meredith Gregory wrote: > Lifted, > >