Hi Derek, I noticed you checked in a change to Lift that updated the Maven ScalaTest ref. However the ref is to version 0.9.4, whereas the current version is 0.9.5.
Thanks. Bill ---- Bill Venners Artima, Inc. http://www.artima.com On Aug 15, 2009, at 7:02 AM, Derek Chen-Becker <dchenbec...@gmail.com> wrote: > OK, a preliminary version of log wrappers is checked in on wip-dcb- > sql-log-wrappers. I'll merge it on Tuesday if no one sees any > problems with it. > > Derek > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Derek Chen-Becker <dchenbec...@gmail.com > > wrote: > Will do. > > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 2:33 AM, marius d. <marius.dan...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Please do so. If you need any help for some reason (time availability > etc.) please let me know. As a note probably the wrappers should be > only only when there is at least one log function registered. > > Br's, > Marius > > On Aug 6, 11:48 pm, Derek Chen-Becker <dchenbec...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If there's a consensus that we want our own JDBC wrappers I'll go > ahead and > > write them. > > > > Derek > > > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 1:19 PM, marius d. > <marius.dan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Probably building our own wrappers would be more lightweight > then 3-rd > > > party. Jus' guessing > > > > > Br's, > > > Marius > > > > > On Aug 6, 9:58 pm, Derek Chen-Becker <dchenbec...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Well, I started looking at it and determined that the only way > for us to > > > > truly log the queries would be to essentially make our own > wrappers over > > > > Statement and PreparedStatement. There are projects (log4jdbc, > notably) > > > that > > > > already do this, and in a transparent manner. I'm not sure > that adding a > > > > whole bunch of SQL logging directly to Lift is better than > leveraging > > > some > > > > existing libraries to do it. > > > > > > Derek > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 11:03 AM, marius d. > <marius.dan...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Yeah we're aware of that. That is based on toString > application which > > > > > is JDBC driver dependent. I think Derek started some work on > this to > > > > > correct this behavior. Derek ? > > > > > > > Br's, > > > > > Marius > > > > > > > On Aug 6, 8:01 pm, jon <jonhoff...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I have the following in boot: > > > > > > DB.addLogFunc((query, len) => Log.info("The query: > "+query+" took > > > > > > "+len+" milliseconds")) > > > > > > > > I was expecting the query parameter to be sql, but it's > actually some > > > > > > sort of guid > > > > > > > > "INFO - The query: 6839c016-0122-f09a-9c96-0000003844e8 > took 5 > > > > > > milliseconds" > > > > > > > > Any ideas? > > > > > > I'm running with derby. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Jon > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
