Note sure I'd agree make is all that simple... Unless you're doing something
VERY basic then it's loaded with potential for accidental complexity. The
whole philosophy of maven is to do the Right Thing(tm) by default, although
I must admit that boilerplate for configuring plugins is frequently a
2009/6/9 Viktor Klang viktor.kl...@gmail.com
Awesome idea.
Would be great to establish some kind of curriculum with joint teaching
material to be able to offer courses worldwide.
+1
We have been doing something similar with Eclipse =
www.eclipse-training.net
And very recently we also
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Heiko Seeberger
heiko.seeber...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/6/9 Viktor Klang viktor.kl...@gmail.com
Awesome idea.
Would be great to establish some kind of curriculum with joint teaching
material to be able to offer courses worldwide.
+1
We have been
Luc,
Jorge, Kaliya and I did a LiftWorkshop in November. We had 6 people at the
workshop. We tried to pack in Scala and Lift all into a day... it didn't
work.
Jorge and I have done some review and we figure there's 3 days of Scala
training and 2-3 days of Lift training that would be a minimum
In addition to the Lift Workshop, I also co-taught a ten-week (1.5hrs/wk)
course at Stanford on Scala. It was targeted at advanced undergrads and
graduate students. Most were programming language enthusiasts, so the course
focused more on the interesting parts of Scala from a programming language
Since the topic seems to have morphed into learning Scala and Lift by
immersion in a day, as a recent Scala convert, I can't begin to
emphasize how important it is to have the build infrastructure all
done in a simple way to let novices focus on Scala. Lift is a good
example where you have no
I must say, I have not met a build system (besides automake) that
exceeded make in complexity. The amount of funny exceptions to rules
is astounding. I had far less trouble learning maven (in all its
complexity)
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 9, 2009, at 4:56 PM, Alexy Khrabrov
