This is very cool!
Its also great for lift as a brand as generally speaking, anything
that is associated with SAP is considered 'enterprise' by those in the
business world which hopefully should aid lift's adoption :-)
Cheers
Tim
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
I'm also interested in authorization and authentication. If your
going to
use a application server like Glassfish, JAAS is possibility.
However, I'm trying to decide whether to use Acegi (without Spring)
or look at something like JSecurity. Any thoughts as to which would
be a better fit with
I wish I could tell you. I took a look at Acegi when I was playing
around with Spring three years ago, but haven't been back. I am a Ruby
programmer, not a Java programmer, so I was planning to roll my own.
That said, it might be a good idea to check these out. I keep forgetting
that Lift
I'm going to be dealing with these sorts problems in the next couple
of weeks, so I'm also interested in any experiences either of you have
(and will be sure to share my own once I get there.) My initial plan
had been to try to integrate Acegi as well; I'll let you know how it
goes when I get to
Folks,
I'm going to spend Monday going through all the various emails that I
haven't had a chance to answer including the Access Control and Menu
threads.
Thanks,
David
--
Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
Collaborative Task Management http://much4.us
Follow me:
Interesting thread - my understanding of Acegi is that it can be
implemented as a servlet filter (i guess in a similar way to lift),
but it has some dependencies on the spring framework itself? Its been
a *long* time since i did anything with spring!
Im no JSecurity or Acegi expert, but just
Excellent Dave and congrats!
Can't wait to see the videos ... hopefully this time the videos quality is
better so I can actually see you :)
Br's,
Marius
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 10:07 AM, David Pollak
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
I've been at SAP TechEd (the geek fest that SAP throws
Much less so, thank you! I guess I didn't walk far enough back up the
inheritance hierarchy to notice toList, toSeq etc.
Kris
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Jorge Ortiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you're using your custom implicit for CollectionWrapper, you can
just call toList on the
I think I found the cleaner method you were talking about; it's in 0.10:
bind(item, chooseTemplate(order,items,xhtml), ...)
which internally does almost exactly what your code is doing. There
are also a couple of versions simply named template that return a
Can[NodeSeq] instead of NodeSeq.Empty
On Sep 11, 10:27 pm, Charles F. Munat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The websites I build tend to have the following features in common:
1. Some method of authentication. I mostly roll my own, but as I
sometimes have one set of users using multiple sites, I'm curious about
OpenID. I know that
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFJMpFkpoQU
Marius Danciu wrote:
Excellent Dave and congrats!
Can't wait to see the videos ... hopefully this time the videos
quality is better so I can actually see you :)
Br's,
Marius
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 10:07 AM, David Pollak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sep 11, 11:52 pm, Kris Nuttycombe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think I found the cleaner method you were talking about; it's in 0.10:
bind(item, chooseTemplate(order,items,xhtml), ...)
which internally does almost exactly what your code is doing.
Right. Pretty handy huh?
There are also
BRAVO !
On Sep 12, 12:01 am, David Pollak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFJMpFkpoQU
Marius Danciu wrote:
Excellent Dave and congrats!
Can't wait to see the videos ... hopefully this time the videos
quality is better so I can actually see you :)
Br's,
It appears that if I use lift:embed .../ to embed a template,
bindings that I have declared that would be interpreted properly in
the embedding template are not propagated to the embedee. Is this by
design? How can I facilitate this sort of template reuse?
I had hoped that lift:embed might be
There's some parallels between Lift's templates and lazy evaluation.
In the examples below, the code inside the snippets is lazy, it
doesn't get evaluated until it is needed.
Maybe what we need is a way to programmatically force evaluation of
some template-code? Then if a snippet has an embed
Also nice would be ways to programmatically access template features,
e.g. embed(template) or snippet(Class:method), etc
--j
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Jorge Ortiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's some parallels between Lift's templates and lazy evaluation.
In the examples below, the
Well done Dave!
On Sep 11, 5:15 pm, Marius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BRAVO !
On Sep 12, 12:01 am, David Pollak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFJMpFkpoQU
Marius Danciu wrote:
Excellent Dave and congrats!
Can't wait to see the videos ... hopefully this time
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 3:49 PM, David Pollak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are trying to embed a lift:embed .../ in the body of a snippet...
e.g.:
lift:MySnippet
lift:embed .../
/lift:MySnippet
That is indeed essentially what I was trying to do; in the application
I'm building I have
You mean like the eager_eval=true flag on snippets that I added 20
seconds ago. :-)
Jorge Ortiz wrote:
There's some parallels between Lift's templates and lazy evaluation.
In the examples below, the code inside the snippets is lazy, it
doesn't get evaluated until it is needed.
Maybe what we
Jorge Ortiz wrote:
Also nice would be ways to programmatically access template features,
e.g. embed(template) or snippet(Class:method), etc
Some of these are available on LiftSession, but it might be cool to add
this stuff to S to make it easer to call... wanna add that code?
--j
On
Marius wrote:
Also, I like the user-created pages to be accessible by URL (i.e.
without a query string) with a readable URL, so:
mysite.com/some_page
Not:
mysite.com/p123456, mysite.com?page=some_page, or mysite.com?page=123456
What is the difference between mysite.com/some_page and
lift:MySnippet eager_eval=true
lift:embed...
/lift:MySnippet
will do the right thing (give Hudson about 2 hours to get the code into
the Lift Maven respository).
Kris Nuttycombe wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 3:49 PM, David Pollak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are trying to embed a
Very cool, this works exactly as I had hoped. I'll put together a bit
of documentation together on the wiki this evening.
Thanks again,
Kris
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 4:52 PM, David Pollak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kris Nuttycombe wrote:
Wow... Thank you! I've been involved with some
Kris Nuttycombe wrote:
Very cool, this works exactly as I had hoped. I'll put together a bit
of documentation together on the wiki this evening.
Great. Documentation is good.
Thanks again,
You are welcome.
Kris
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 4:52 PM, David Pollak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charles F. Munat wrote:
I'm trying to access a page about/index.html using the url
about/
If I add it to the site map:
Menu(Loc(about, List(about, index), About))
I can access it at about/
but if I use lift:Menu.item name=about / to put the link on the
page, then the link url comes
This can probably be done better, but it seems to work:
def buildLink(name: String, text: NodeSeq): NodeSeq =
for (loc - SiteMap.findAndTestLoc(name).toList;
link - Full(loc.link.buildUri.filter(_ !=
index).mkString(/, /, )))
yield a href={link}{
text match {
I copied the Misc snippet over from the example, changed the package and
import statements to fit my app, and created a users/index page.
lift:surround with=default at=content
a href='/simple/add'Add a User/a
table width=90%
lift:Misc.users /
/table
/lift:surround
The app builds
27 matches
Mail list logo
