Charles F. Munat wrote:
Running Ajax calls between fields for validation is pretty ugly,
javascript validation would be better
That's what I said.
Sorry, Oliver. On re-reading, that sounds a little snippy, but I didn't
mean it that way. I just meant that we agree -- after mentioning it as
Hey Chas,
No worries, I re-read too and understood the tone of your reply.
I'm playing devils advocate on validation to try to get a flexible
framework for everyone to use.
Ol
On 24/09/2008, at 4:07 PM, Charles F. Munat wrote:
Charles F. Munat wrote:
Running Ajax calls between fields for
Looks to me like a bug. I mean it appears to render the random string
generated instead of what createLink returns.
Br's,
Marius
On Sep 24, 12:15 pm, Charles F. Munat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I create an external link in the SiteMap thus:
Menu(Loc(google, ExtLink(http://google.com/;),
Hi,
I was looking over the JsonHandler stuff and it looks pretty
interesting. I thought I'd try it out for a member add page on my latest
project, but I can't figure out how to pass state through the snippet.
Basically, I have a Team object that I want to add coaches (Member
objects) to. I was
Also, when writing immutable objects, constructors suck since they do not
encourage object sharing...
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Kris Nuttycombe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
If you're going to take that approach, why not just make the
constructor or factory method ensure that the object is
Kris Nuttycombe wrote:
If you're going to take that approach, why not just make the
constructor or factory method ensure that the object is in a valid
state to begin with? When I write immutable objects, they usually
don't have any setters for that very reason. It doesn't make sense to
me
And how did you convert the Loc to an URL?
Marius wrote:
Looks to me like a bug. I mean it appears to render the random string
generated instead of what createLink returns.
Br's,
Marius
On Sep 24, 12:15 pm, Charles F. Munat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I create an external link in
Sorry, I should have mentioned that I'm using the new group function.
When I use builder, it works fine. I notice that the new group function
ignores Hidden and doesn't work with ExtLink links. I'm slowly working
through it to figure out why, but you probably already know why.
Chas.
David
Hi,
I understand from SLS what _root_ does ... but I'm wondering what is
the reason behind it in lift. What was the problem?
Br's,
Marius
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Lift group.
To post to this
I believe this is the genesis:
http://www.nabble.com/Unfortunate-package-path-conflict-(security-vulnerability-)-tc19618678.html
On Sep 24, 4:13 pm, Marius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I understand from SLS what _root_ does ... but I'm wondering what is
the reason behind it in lift. What was
DISCLAIMER Nothing is this e-mail is meant to imply that any future public
version of Lift will compile with Scala 2.7.2. At the moment, all future
public versions of Lift will compile with Scala 2.7.1 until DavidP says
otherwise. /DISCLAIMER
Here are the instructions for compiling Lift under
11 matches
Mail list logo
