David,
Excellent. This is exactly what I was looking for.
Thanks.
Glenn
On Sep 30, 4:54 pm, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
JqHtml and JqEmptyAfter eagerly evaluate the NodeSeq on the server, so
there's no way to get client-side JS execution in a NodeSeq.
You can write
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 8:25 AM, glenn gl...@exmbly.com wrote:
David,
Excellent. This is exactly what I was looking for.
Wow. I think this is the first time I've actually helped you. I'm sorry
I'm bad at understanding what you ask for.
More broadly, the JavaScript stuff in Lift is not
David,
This is off topic, but you always are a help. Your
thoughtful assistance on this discussion group either directly
resolves issues I'm
having with Lift, or leads me to rethink my strategy and explore new
avenues
I haven't thought of. At the very least, you force me to reframe many
of my
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 1:22 PM, glenn gl...@exmbly.com wrote:
I'd like to converting the following
JsRaw(function() $('#item-save').html(this.id + ' was
toggled'))
into something more object-oriented, using JQuery support functions in
Lift.
I've tried various combiniations, including
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:36 AM, glenn gl...@exmbly.com wrote:
David,
I can't do this, AnonFunc(JqId(item-save) JqEmptyAfter
(divthis.id was
toggled/div)) , if that's what you mean.
That's not what I wrote. Please look again at the curly braces around the
this.id:
David,
The problem with writting the NodeSeq as div{this.id} was toggled/
div)
is that it generates the following JavaScript:
function() {jQuery('#'+item-save).empty().after(div-1 was
toggled/div);
that is, Lift evaluates {this.id} in relation to the snippet, then
outputs the value
in the
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 1:08 PM, glenn gl...@exmbly.com wrote:
David,
The problem with writting the NodeSeq as div{this.id} was toggled/
div)
is that it generates the following JavaScript:
function() {jQuery('#'+item-save).empty().after(div-1 was
toggled/div);
that is, Lift evaluates
Try JsVar(this, id) or JsRaw(this.id)
-Ross
On Sep 29, 2009, at 4:22 PM, glenn wrote:
I'd like to converting the following
JsRaw(function() $('#item-save').html(this.id + ' was
toggled'))
into something more object-oriented, using JQuery support functions in
Lift.
I've tried various
Hi, Ross,
Unfornately, all of these just result in:
function() {jQuery('#'+item-save).empty().after(divthis.id was
toggled/div);}
They simply treat this.id as part of the passed in NodeSeq,
divthis.id was toggled/div. I need it
to output divthis.id + was toggled/div.
Glenn
On Sep 29, 1:46
Well the compiler is trying to convert your JsRaw into a NodeSeq, because
that's what happens to anything inside an xml literal. It probably uses
toString.
I can't tell you how to do it correctly because I'm not familiar with Lift's
javascript functionality.
Oh I'm sorry, I got tunnel vision and did not read the rest of your
code. You'll not be able to do quite what you want, since this.id is
on the javascript side and the NodeSeq is on the server side.
If you really want this.id within that div, I think you'll have to
construct or modify the
Ross,
I think you and I came to same conclusion. Writing it as raw
JavaScript, as I
did initially, seems the only way I could find to do this. FYI, where
I was using this
was with the TreeView widget. There, toggle takes an anonymous
function, and
this is an implicit parameter, denoting the
Maybe write javascript code that gets all its variables by calling functions.
Then supply those functions as Lift JsXX. This way you can supply values from
Lift but the javascript program is written in javascript.
-
glenngl...@exmbly.com wrote:
Ross,
I
I'm sure opinions vary, but my personal preference in general is to
implement JavaScript in JavaScript as a linked .js file and leave the
HTML/XML generation in the server and not mix the two terribly much
unless it's simple or there's a compelling reason.
What do you mean by more
14 matches
Mail list logo
