Wilson MacGyver a écrit :
> You feel this confident about Scala 2.8 release by Jan?
>
> I'm curious because Scala 2.8 schedule seem to be
> a fairly moving target.
My finger is telling me that we are going to see a "release candidate
for the release candidate" hummm tomorrow ;)
--
Francois A
David Pollak a écrit :
> I'm going to get the "in earnest" Lift -> 2.8 port rolling tomorrow.
> Hopefully, I'll have a branch that tracks the current Lift code running
> by mid next week.
That's so a great new :)
> We are *very* serious and *VERY* (lots of emphasis) committed to Scala
> 2.8
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Wilson MacGyver wrote:
>
> You feel this confident about Scala 2.8 release by Jan?
>
Maybe Scala 2.8 gets pushed back a little and we push Lift 1.1 back a
little.
If Scala 2.8 beta (which is coming very soon) is a complete disaster (I give
this a < 10% probabili
Its been a moving target since June ;-) Its gotta stop sometime, right?
Cheers, Tim
On 12 Nov 2009, at 19:16, Wilson MacGyver wrote:
>
> You feel this confident about Scala 2.8 release by Jan?
>
> I'm curious because Scala 2.8 schedule seem to be
> a fairly moving target.
>
> On Thu, Nov 12
You feel this confident about Scala 2.8 release by Jan?
I'm curious because Scala 2.8 schedule seem to be
a fairly moving target.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:13 PM, David Pollak
wrote:
>
> We are *very* serious and *VERY* (lots of emphasis) committed to Scala 2.8.
> I'm expecting that Lift 1.1 sh
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Francois Armand wrote:
>
> Hello guys,
>
> I'm on the process of choosing a web framework for one of my (scala 2.8)
> project. I know Tapestry 5, but as we are likely to have a lot of AJAX
> to deal with, and T5 is not the best tool for that. I looked at gwt, but
DPP has a local branch running a crippled version of lift that builds with 2.8
Is there any reason you could not work with 2.7.7 for your dev - it would get
you most of the way there until 2.8 is released.
Cheers, Tim
On 12 Nov 2009, at 18:37, Francois Armand wrote:
>
> Hello guys,
>
> I'm
