RE: [Lift] Beef with LiftRules.explicitlyParsedSuffixes

2009-11-27 Thread Naftoli Gugenheim
: Re: [Lift] Beef with LiftRules.explicitlyParsedSuffixes I'm not overly keen on the whitelist stuff.  Someone's going to get cranky about it. I'm open to either adding a whole lot more to the white list or saying that everything n characters (e.g., 5) is a suffix unless it's on a blacklist

Re: [Lift] Beef with LiftRules.explicitlyParsedSuffixes

2009-11-25 Thread Derek Chen-Becker
Was that what was preventing your dispatch from working? On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 4:43 AM, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.euwrote: Guys, I have some major issues with LiftRules.explicitlyParsedSuffixes - I just wasted almost a whole day yesterday chasing around what I thought were bugs

Re: [Lift] Beef with LiftRules.explicitlyParsedSuffixes

2009-11-25 Thread Timothy Perrett
Yeah :-) I had not realised that there was this list of approved extensions. I actually have a custom mime type and extension in my application and upgrading from M6 to SNAPSHOT caused this extremely difficult to debug situation. As below, some warnings or something like that would really

Re: [Lift] Beef with LiftRules.explicitlyParsedSuffixes

2009-11-25 Thread Derek Chen-Becker
I would agree. In general I would lean toward being overly verbose about what's happening in Lift when in dev mode. On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.euwrote: Yeah :-) I had not realised that there was this list of approved extensions. I actually have a

Re: [Lift] Beef with LiftRules.explicitlyParsedSuffixes

2009-11-25 Thread David Pollak
I'm not overly keen on the whitelist stuff. Someone's going to get cranky about it. I'm open to either adding a whole lot more to the white list or saying that everything n characters (e.g., 5) is a suffix unless it's on a blacklist. On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 5:49 AM, Timothy Perrett

Re: [Lift] Beef with LiftRules.explicitlyParsedSuffixes

2009-11-25 Thread Timothy Perrett
Agreed - I work with lift every day and this was a new one on me! I think adding a whole raft of common types would be the simplest way to go an be quickest to implement. If memory serves there is a fairly comprehensive list on IANA (or some similar acronym) that we could grab and implement

Re: [Lift] Beef with LiftRules.explicitlyParsedSuffixes

2009-11-25 Thread David Pollak
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.euwrote: Agreed - I work with lift every day and this was a new one on me! I think adding a whole raft of common types would be the simplest way to go an be quickest to implement. If memory serves there is a fairly

Re: [Lift] Beef with LiftRules.explicitlyParsedSuffixes

2009-11-25 Thread Timothy Perrett
Im all over it. I'll have a fix on review board within the hour. Cheers, Tim On 25 Nov 2009, at 17:09, David Pollak wrote: On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.eu wrote: Agreed - I work with lift every day and this was a new one on me! I think adding