Re: [Lift] minified js artifacts (was Re: Re-opened #363)

2010-03-03 Thread Jeppe Nejsum Madsen
Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.com writes: A quick followup on this minified js concern... [...] So the question is, should we: 1. Continue using yuicompressor (to compress js files at build time) and apply the strategy universally to all toserve/**/*.js OR 2. Include the minified

Re: [Lift] minified js artifacts (was Re: Re-opened #363)

2010-03-03 Thread Indrajit Raychaudhuri
On 03/03/10 9:21 PM, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen wrote: Indrajit Raychaudhuriindraj...@gmail.com writes: A quick followup on this minified js concern... [...] So the question is, should we: 1. Continue using yuicompressor (to compress js files at build time) and apply the strategy universally

Re: [Lift] minified js artifacts (was Re: Re-opened #363)

2010-03-03 Thread David Bernard
Info about yuicompressor-maven-plugin : * could aggregate js * could be configured to avoid minified some files * could generate minified under src with suffix (default -min) * could generate the gzip version and avoid doing it at runtime * could be invoked only in a profile (for release) or from

Re: [Lift] minified js artifacts (was Re: Re-opened #363)

2010-03-03 Thread Jeppe Nejsum Madsen
Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.com writes: [...] My interest in the current context, is to have consistent behavior in the js artifacts bundled with Lift. To me (and Marius) #2 is also worth consideration. True that you'd have a compressed (IDE unfriendly) js in the codebase but

Re: [Lift] minified js artifacts (was Re: Re-opened #363)

2010-03-03 Thread Indrajit Raychaudhuri
On 03/03/10 10:21 PM, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen wrote: Indrajit Raychaudhuriindraj...@gmail.com writes: [...] My interest in the current context, is to have consistent behavior in the js artifacts bundled with Lift. To me (and Marius) #2 is also worth consideration. True that you'd have a