Good morning Matt,
> I can't imagine the constants add up that fast... Allow 25 channels per peer
> and limit your peers reasonably and the cost should be low enough. Really not
> sure why something like a 25 channel limit should limit any usage or
> reasonably burden a node, what am I
Good morning Matt,
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [Lightning-dev] [1.1] Proposed `funding_cancelled` message
> Local Time: January 15, 2018 9:00 AM
> UTC Time: January 15, 2018 1:00 AM
> From:
Complete n00b question here: if one side of the channel have 100% of the
funds, can the last message give that user complete controll over the
channel (to close it "unilateral" without any interaction from the other
side?
And that way change the fee size when that part want's to close the
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 10:30:28AM +0900, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> Hey everybody.
>
> Say that the last time we updated channel state, we assumed 40 satoshi/byte
> was enough to get confirmed, then I leave the channel for a few weeks, come
> back to find my partner fell off the face of the
