Good morning Rene,
Please consider the recent discussion about AMP, atomic multi-path.
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2018-February/000993.html
Note that only the source (payer) can split the payment into multiple smaller
payments; we cannot safely let intermediaries
On 09/14/2017 11:49 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
I guess I'm confused how this is going to work safely. If you
put a refund request in with your payment, isn't that revealing the
public key of your node and then defeating the whole purpose of the
onion routing of the payment in
and any thoughts on protections against flood pinging?
On Thu, 2018-03-01 at 09:45 -0500, Jim Posen wrote:
> The main benefit is that this should make it quicker to send a
> successful payment because latency is lower than sending an actual
> payment and the sender could ping all possible
Hey everyone,
disclaimer I am new here and have not a full understanding of the complete
specs yet - however since I decided to participate in lighting dev I will
just be brave and try to add my ideas on the problem jimpo posed. So even
in case by ideas are complete bs please just tell me in a
