Conner Fromknecht writes:
> In light of this, and if I'm following along, it seems our hand is forced in
> splicing via a single on-chain transaction. In my book, this is preferable
> anyway. I'd much rather push complexity off-chain than having to do a
> mutli-stage splicing pipeline.
Agreed. A
Good morning Margherita,
There are no possible double-spend attacks on Lightning Network.
You cannot double-spend your funds unless the other end of the channel agrees
to the double-spending. And what will happen is that the other end of the
channel will in fact effectively lose money. Assumi
Dear Lighning-dev group,
I am Margherita Favaretto, a Master student of Cyber Security at the Technical
University of Denamark (DTU). I'm currently in San Francisco for one month, to
advance with my academic research on Lightning Network by taking part to the
networking events that are happenin
Jim Posen writes:
> Instead of leaving an extra output for CPFP, is it not sufficient to just
> sign all inputs with ANYONECANPAY and expect the sender to make an exact
> output for the fees input? It would require an extra tx assuming they don't
> already have a properly sized UTXO handy (which t
