Re: [Lightning-dev] [RFC] Simplified (but less optimal) HTLC Negotiation

2021-04-24 Thread Matt Corallo
> On Apr 24, 2021, at 01:56, Rusty Russell wrote: > > Matt Corallo writes: >> Somehow I missed this thread, but I did note in a previous meeting - these >> issues are great fodder for fuzzing. We’ve had a fuzzer which aggressively >> tests for precisely these types of

Re: [Lightning-dev] Increase channel-jamming capital requirements by not counting dust HTLCs

2021-04-24 Thread Bastien TEINTURIER
You're right, I was thinking about trimmed HTLCs (which can re-appear in the commit tx if you lower the feerate via update_fee). Dust HTLCs will never appear in the commit tx regardless of subsequent update_fees, so Eugene's suggestion could make sense! Le sam. 24 avr. 2021 à 06:02, Matt Corallo