Re: [Lightning-dev] Fee Budgets: A Possible Path Towards Unified Cost Functions For Lightning Pathfinding Problems

2021-08-23 Thread ZmnSCPxj via Lightning-dev
Good morning Stefan, > Hi Zmn! That is some amazing lateral thinking you have been applying there. > I'm quite certain I haven't understood everything fully, but it has been > highly entertaining to read. Will have to give it a closer read when I get > some time. > > As a first impression,

Re: [Lightning-dev] Lightning-dev Digest, Vol 72, Issue 18

2021-08-23 Thread Bitcoin Error Log
The dust limit is required to prevent massive UTXO expansion. The details around miner incentives to process dust are irrelevant to this because there simply needs to be a buffer of friction to prevent spamming the UTXO set to be much, much larger, as an *attack* and long-term overhead on both

Re: [Lightning-dev] Zero Fee Routing

2021-08-23 Thread Andrés G . Aragoneses
How is this related to the youtube video posted? Can you link to a specific time in it where it is discussed? On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 at 00:30, Daki Carnhof wrote: > This text was brought to life by repelling magnet forces of reading > ZmnSCPxj's Algorithm For Channel Fee Settings. Thank you, Zmn!