Huge thanks to Antoine Riard for the responsible disclosure and for helping to
make lnd more safu. More information can be found in Antoine’s disclosure [5].
Regards,
Conner Fromknecht
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEnI1hhop8SSADsnRO59c3tn+lkscFAl+PWykACgkQ59c3tn+l
ksf7Yg
ping to
make lnd more safu. More information can be found in Antoine’s disclosure [5].
Regards,
Conner Fromknecht
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEnI1hhop8SSADsnRO59c3tn+lkscFAl+PWzMACgkQ59c3tn+l
kseIJw//UwswUyh6BNgmi4D8NoC6olelW0dRmecqcZF7JBQa619kVFm/D7ri
ble
check the plaintext matches
verbatim with what was sent on lightning-dev.
Cheers,
Conner
On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 5:19 PM Conner Fromknecht
wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi all,
>
> We are writing to let the Lightning community know abou
/lnd/blob/master/docs/INSTALL.md#installing-lnd.
Regards,
Conner Fromknecht
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEnI1hhop8SSADsnRO59c3tn+lkscFAl9/ozwACgkQ59c3tn+l
kscVvBAAk21z6tlHPkOSwfj1lBE0pqc65A6Qa927WEjN5hdUpjjof4Xo2j+GzbnN
Uoj4HGZu+koakzoVpJ4mzN+vg086zAnv+K668hhl7bbPHsQu6FqA1ALiAyy0nH6H
Good evening,
> I didn't think this was the design. The update transaction can spend any
prior, with a fixed script, due to NOINPUT.
>From my reading of the final construction, each update transaction has a
unique script to bind settlement transactions to exactly one update.
> My understanding
Hi ZmnSCPxj,
Precisely, something like that is what I had in mind.
Since the max message size is 65KB, one option could be to only allow
the varint to
be max 2 bytes where:
- if the 8th bit is not set, the lowest 7 bits of the first bytes
translate to 0 - 127
- if the 8th bit is set, this
Hi ZmnSCPxj,
Thanks for writing this up! I had started an email, but you beat me to it :)
> 1. For a sequence of `type,len,value`, each `type` must be unique. --
> accepted.
To add to this, it seemed that there was some agreement that repeated fields
should be serialized under a single root
vector if the tower
inherently defends against it. If instead they are just trying to fill
up the tower, the cost
is linear in the amount of blobs they send.
--Conner
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 4:12 PM Conner Fromknecht
wrote:
>
> Hi ZmnSCPxj,
>
> I haven't yet gotten around to writing up ever
Hi ZmnSCPxj,
I haven't yet gotten around to writing up everything documenting in the working
watchtower design. However, I think we are nearing that phase where things seem
mostly solidified and would welcome feedback before attempting to formalize it.
Expect some follow up posts on the ML :)
>
Good morning all,
Taking a step back—even if key switching can be done mathematically, it seems
dubious that we would want to introduce re-routing or rendezvous routing in this
manner. If the example provided _could_ be done, it would directly violate the
wrap-resistance property of the ideal
Good morning all,
> MUST NOT forward (if an intermediate node) or claim (if the final node) unless
> it has received a total greater or equal to `intended_total_payment` in all
> incoming HTLCs for the same `payment_hash`.
I was under the impression that this would not require changes on behalf
> How do i unsubscribe from this email list? Could someone help me please.
There’s a link in the footer to the linux list, there you can enter your
email to unsubscribe
Cheers,
Conner
-- Sent from my Spaceship
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 17:19 alexis petropoulos
wrote:
> How do i unsubscribe from
The ability for a watchtower to spend them independently seems to resolve
this*
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 01:30 Conner Fromknecht
<conner@lightning.engineering> wrote:
> Hi ZmnSCPxj,
>
>
> > I understand. For myself, I will also wait for comment from other
> c-lightning
&g
Hi ZmnSCPxj,
> I understand. For myself, I will also wait for comment from other
c-lightning
> developers: this seems to require a bit of surgery on our code I think
> (currently construction of justice transactions is done in a separate
process,
> and we always generate a justice transaction
Good evening ZmnSCPxj,
> Also, thank you for the link.
Definitely! I had to do some digging myself to recover these hidden gems.
> I understand. It would be good to know what you have, and perhaps consider
> planning a new BOLT document for such.
Yes, that is the ultimate goal. I think it
Hi ZmnSCPxj,
> Can you describe the "encrypted blob" approach to me? Or point me to
> materials?
There's an awesome watchtower thread on the mailing list from 2016 that
starts
here [1]. It covers a broader range of possibilities than just the encrypted
blob approach, and also considers other
Hi everyone,
I've seen some discussions over losing proofs of payment in the AMP setting,
and wanted to address some lingering concerns I have regarding the
soundness of using the current invoicing system to prove payments.
In general, I think we are ascribing too much weight to simply having a
17 matches
Mail list logo
