Good morning Christian,
> That is a very good observation. Indeed the absolute timelocks need to
>
> be far enough in the future so that we can commit the latest branch of
>
> the invalidation tree on-chain and then commit the HTLC resolution
>
> before the HTLC timeout expires. That means that
ZmnSCPxj writes:
> Good morning Christian,
>
> I wonder suddenly, about how HTLCs are offered under
> Decker-Wattenhofer Duplex Micropayment Channels.
>
> Under the Decker-Wattenhofer construction, I believe the transaction
> sequence is the below:
>
> funding -> trigger -> (relative-timelock) in
Good morning Christian,
I wonder suddenly, about how HTLCs are offered under Decker-Wattenhofer Duplex
Micropayment Channels.
Under the Decker-Wattenhofer construction, I believe the transaction sequence
is the below:
funding -> trigger -> (relative-timelock) invalidation tree -> ...
(relati
