Re: [Lightning-dev] Jamming Mitigation Call Summary - 01/23

2023-02-04 Thread Antoine Riard
Hi Clara, > * They will likely require a network wide upgrade: when a sender >makes a payment, the full path will need to understand the new >feature bit for it to be used. I believe the upgradeability dimension is different both for circuit breaker and staking credentials --

Re: [Lightning-dev] Jamming Mitigation Call Summary - 01/23

2023-01-31 Thread Antoine Riard
(Reply 2/2) > * Whether we should look into a more complicated approach that >includes a "proof of forward" secret in the next node's onion which >must be supplied to claim the upfront fee. One of the hard things with a "proof of forward" is a hop colluding with the next counterparty

Re: [Lightning-dev] Jamming Mitigation Call Summary - 01/23

2023-01-31 Thread Antoine Riard
Hi Clara, (Reply 1/2 - Apparently there is a limit of 80KB on Lightning mailing post) > * They will likely require a network wide upgrade: when a sender >makes a payment, the full path will need to understand the new >feature bit for it to be used. I believe the upgradeability

[Lightning-dev] Jamming Mitigation Call Summary - 01/23

2023-01-30 Thread Carla Kirk-Cohen
Hi list, On Monday last week we resumed our fortnightly channel jamming mitigation calls for 2023. Details for the next call: * Monday 02/06 @ 18:00 UTC * https://meet.jit.si/UnjammingLN * Agenda: https://github.com/ClaraShk/LNJamming/issues/2 # Meeting Summary This email attempts to summarize