Hi Lloyd,
Thanks for taking the time to read!
What we were trying to describe in this section is the failure to construct
a DLC channel by using only a fund transaction (on-chain), CETs and a
refund transaction (same as the on-chain version), but adding revocation
secrets to the CETs and the
Hi Thibaut,
Thanks for carrying out this research. I have not finished reading the
paper but have a question about what you call the "straw man" proposal
early on:
"At the end of this protocol, both Alice and Bob have the set of signed
transactions for the second DLC, and the transactions for
