> Bob can craft a HTLC-preimage spend of the single offered output spending one
> of 0.1 BTC HTLC payout (and revealing its preimage) while burning all the
> value as fee. This replaces out Alice's honest HTLC-timeout out of network
> mempools, are they're concurrent spend. Bob can repeat this t
Hi John!
I have two questions regarding the window, which are related.
1. Why is the window aligned? IIUC, this means that the blocks mined
since the latest block whose height is divisible by window_size do not
affect transaction's validity. So a recent change of fees does not
reflect if a transa
The fees paid to mine the set of transactions in a given block are known only to the miner that produced the block. Assuming that tx inputs less outputs represents an actual economic force is an error.eOn Dec 22, 2023, at 09:24, jlspc via bitcoin-dev wrote:Hi Antoine,
Thanks for your thoughtful
Hi Antoine,
Thanks for your thoughtful response.
Comments inline below:
> Hi John,
> While the idea of using sliding reaction window for blockchain congestion
> detection has been present in the "smart contract" space at large [0] and
> this has been discussed informally among Lightning devs an
Dear lightning developers,
I'd like to discuss a new address format to send and receive payments among LN
wallets, think of a successor of the "Lightning Address", it's not a new BOLT
and
neither needs to be part of the specs but i'm writing here to collect feedback
from devs and wallet implem
On Mon Dec 4, 2023 at 9:32 PM CET, Matt Corallo wrote:
> On the call the vote was split between "host our own ML, or maybe use
> groups.io" and "some discourse
> instance, probably delvingbitcoin.org", with a weak majority for the second.
>
> With that in mind, we're gonna give delvingbitcoin.org
Hi list.
First of all, Merry Christmas!
In my free time, I have been working on a lightning node using LDK,
which I've named [Lampo](https://github.com/vincenzopalazzo/lampo.rs)
(Italian for lightning), for more than 1.5 years.
The initial draft was developed as a toy lightning node to support
Hi John,Honest is a misnomer, which is underpinning the concept. There is nothing dishonest about such payments. The downside is that the payer forgoes anonymity relative to the miner, but this is not dishonest, nor is mining one’s own transactions (where the represented “fee” implies nothing). Ass
Hi Boris,
Responses inline below:
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
On Friday, December 22nd, 2023 at 8:36 AM, Nagaev Boris
wrote:
> Hi John!
>
> I have two questions regarding the window, which are related.
>
> 1. Why is the window aligned? IIUC, this means that the blocks mined
> sinc
On 2023-12-28 08:06, jlspc via bitcoin-dev wrote:
On Friday, December 22nd, 2023 at 8:36 AM, Nagaev Boris
wrote:
To validate a transaction with FDT [...]
a light client would have to determine the median fee
rate of the recent blocks. To do that without involving trust, it has
to download the b
Hi Eric,
I agree that users can pay miners offchain and miners can create blocks where
the difference between inputs and outputs exceeds the fees paid (by mining
their own transactions). I model that behavior as dishonest mining. Onchain
fees seem to reflect congestion for now, but it's true th
11 matches
Mail list logo
