Andy Schroder
On 12/27/2017 01:06 AM, ZmnSCPxj wrote:
Good morning Andy,
Andy Schroder
On 12/27/2017 12:18 AM, Andy Schroder wrote:
Channel closing
costs dwarf the gains to be made from cheating, however.
Since millisatoshis is used, is there a maximum channel funding size?
Yes, the uppe
Andy Schroder
On 12/27/2017 12:56 AM, ZmnSCPxj wrote:
Good morning Andy,
Channel closing
costs dwarf the gains to be made from cheating, however.
Since millisatoshis is used, is there a maximum channel
funding size?
Yes, the upper 32 bits must be zero, from B
Good morning Andy,
> Andy Schroder
>
> On 12/27/2017 12:18 AM, Andy Schroder wrote:
>
>>> Channel closing
>>> costs dwarf the gains to be made from cheating, however.
>>>
Since millisatoshis is used, is there a maximum channel funding size?
>>>
>>> Yes, the upper 32 bits must be zero, from BO
Andy Schroder
On 12/27/2017 12:18 AM, Andy Schroder wrote:
Channel closing
costs dwarf the gains to be made from cheating, however.
Since millisatoshis is used, is there a maximum channel funding size?
Yes, the upper 32 bits must be zero, from BOLT #2:
- for channels with `chain_hash` id
Good morning Andy,
>
>
>> Channel closing
>> costs dwarf the gains to be made from cheating, however.
>>
>>> Since millisatoshis is used, is there a maximum channel funding size?
>>> Yes, the upper 32 bits must be zero, from BOLT #2:
>>
>> - for channels with chain_hash identifying the Bitcoin blo
Andy Schroder
On 12/18/2017 01:40 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
Andy Schroder writes:
What's the rational for using millisatoshis as the units for lightning
channels? Aren't you going to loose up to 1/2 of a satoshi when the
channel is closed?
You can lose up to 0.999 satoshi per in-progress paym
