Andy Schroder
On 03/15/2018 08:31 PM, ZmnSCPxj wrote:
Good morning Corne,
routing. You could consider the start of the partial route as an
"introduction point"; it is selected by the payee(**). I'm not sure if
it is exactly equivalent to TOR's introduction points th
Good morning list,
For your amusement.
https://zmnscpxj.github.io/offchain/cyclicsuperhubs.html
Regards,
ZmnSCPxj___
Lightning-dev mailing list
Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
Good morning Corne,
> routing. You could consider the start of the partial route as an
>
> "introduction point"; it is selected by the payee(**). I'm not sure if
>
> it is exactly equivalent to TOR's introduction points though.
It is almost equivalent I think.
>
> 2.
Hi Andy,
1. Don't confuse TOR onion routing (used for anonymous/pseudonymous
communication) with Lightning onion routing (used for anonymous
payments). TOR's design is outside the scope of the discussion; as far
as I can see, TOR is only relevant because it exists, it works(*) and it
is useful to
Hi ZmnSCPxj,
Thanks for the links. I've done a bit of reading, and this seems to be
the clearest explanation of what the Web Payments Working Group wants to
achieve:
https://www.w3.org/TR/webpayments-overview/
But maybe Christian can give better / more up-to-date info.
From what I can see, t
