Good evening all,
Thank you Rusty for starting us down this path :) and to ZmnSCPxj and Lisa
for
your thoughts. I think this narrows down the design space considerably!
In light of this, and if I'm following along, it seems our hand is forced in
splicing via a single on-chain transaction. In my b
Hi Rusty et al,
Would this work?
Glossary
Old funding output - the TXO that the channel uses pre-splice. This must be a
SegWit 2-of-2.
New funding output - the TXO that the channel will use post-splice. This must
be a SegWit 2-of-2.
Old commitment transaction - a Poon-Dryja-revoca
Hello,
> 1. Rather than trying to agree on what fees will be in the future, we
> should use an OP_TRUE-style output to allow CPFP (Roasbeef)
We could also use SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY|SIGHASH_SINGLE for HTLC txs, without
adding the "OP_TRUE" output to the commitment transaction. We would still
