Re: [Lightning-dev] [DRAFT] Multi-cell-hop onion with TLV (and example for multi-part-payment)

2018-11-28 Thread Rusty Russell
ZmnSCPxj writes: > Good morning Rusty, > >> There's a kinda-neat intersection between the "use TLV" proposal and the >> "multi-cell-onion" idea, so I want to make a concrete proposal (wording >> needs formalization): >> >> Multi-cell structure: >> >> 1. `realm` (or `per_hop_type` if you prefer)

Re: [Lightning-dev] Dual Funding Proposal

2018-11-28 Thread lisa neigut
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 11:26 PM ZmnSCPxj wrote: > Good morning Lisa, > > Minor comments only, have not studied in detail: > > > > `accept_channel2`: > > [32:temporary_channel_id] > > … // unchanged > > [33:first_per_commitment_point] > > [?: options_tlv] > > options_tlv: > >1. > >

Re: [Lightning-dev] [META] Organization of 1.1 Spec Effort

2018-11-28 Thread Peter Todd
On November 27, 2018 12:13:27 AM UTC, Matt Corallo wrote: >+100 for IRC meetings, though, really, I'd much much stronger prefer >substantive discussion happen on GitHub or the mailing list. Doing >finalization in a live meeting is really unfair to those who can't find >the time to attend