On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 at 13:42, René Pickhardt
wrote:
> Dear Melvin,
>
> I believe the vocabulary is not consistent across implementations. For
> example if you look at c lightning there is no such command `describegraph`
> but there are the two commands `listnodes` and `listchannels` which should
Ok, that would work for this particular case which is of course a very simple
PoC. But the problem of connecting multiple payments to a user account still
stands, or am I missing something?
And the user would also be required to keep a copy of the pre-image for every
bought item right? It feels
Good morning Joao,
>
> Eventually I could use something like SQRL or BitID which enable some level
> of anonymity. But now the user would have to keep an app for login and
> another for payments. He is expected to have both apps to use the service and
> keep both private keys secure. Both woul
Hi ZmnSCPxj,
Thank you for your thoughtfull input.
Let me just clarify that I share the same concerns regarding user privacy. I do
value all the work that’s being done to keep the LN private, trustless and
permissionless.
My intention is not to violate user privacy but to give an option for a
Good morning Joao,
Currently no.
Also, why would you want to violate user privacy in exchange for a service?
You should authorize usage depending on secrets the user knows, not depending
on their "identity".
This is precisely why LN is set up to use zero-knowledge contingent payments.
You releas
