ZmnSCPxj writes:
> Good morning Rusty, et al.,
>
>
>> Note that this means no payment secret is necessary, since the incoming
>> `blinding` serves the same purpose. If we wanted to, we could (ab)use
>> payment_secret as the first 32-bytes to put in Carol's enc1 (i.e. it's
>> the ECDH for Carol to
Good morning Rusty, et al.,
> Note that this means no payment secret is necessary, since the incoming
> `blinding` serves the same purpose. If we wanted to, we could (ab)use
> payment_secret as the first 32-bytes to put in Carol's enc1 (i.e. it's
> the ECDH for Carol to decrypt enc1).
I confess
Good morning Robert,
> How did you know that I'm a closet furry?! ;) I'm shaking in my onesie right
> now...
It was so obvious, my furdar was picking up your furriness just from parsing
the individual bytes arising from your email server.
> It is definitely not my goal to split the network up
