Re: [Lightning-dev] Covert channel recovery with Oblivious Signatures

2020-12-14 Thread Lloyd Fournier
Errr please replace 5 with 4 in the previous post. Thanks to devrandom. LL On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 2:43 PM Lloyd Fournier wrote: > > > It seems difficult to recommend YOLO commitment transactions becoming the > > standard way to recover funds. It could be preferable to the current system > >

Re: [Lightning-dev] Covert channel recovery with Oblivious Signatures

2020-12-14 Thread Lloyd Fournier
> It seems difficult to recommend YOLO commitment transactions becoming the standard way to recover funds. It could be preferable to the current system but even that is up for debate I guess. > I feel like I can recommend oblivious settlements because (i) it's covert (like YOLO commitments txs

Re: [Lightning-dev] Covert channel recovery with Oblivious Signatures

2020-12-14 Thread Ariel Lorenzo-Luaces
I don't think it's so clear that any party refusing to go go first can be assumed to have lost data. If the rule is that the party receiving the connection is the one that must send the oblivious signatures then a party that has both lost data and is receiving a connection can just ignore the