Re: [Lightning-dev] [bitcoin-dev] Taro: A Taproot Asset Representation Overlay

2022-04-11 Thread Olaoluwa Osuntokun
Hi Ruben, > Also, the people that are responsible for the current shape of RGB aren't > the people who originated the idea, so it would not be fair to the > originators either (Peter Todd, Alekos Filini, Giacomo Zucco). Sure I have no problems acknowledging them in the current BIP draft. Both

Re: [Lightning-dev] Taro: A Taproot Asset Representation Overlay

2022-04-11 Thread Olaoluwa Osuntokun
Hi Harding, Great questions! > anything about Taro or the way you plan to implement support for > transferring fungible assets via asset-aware LN endpoints[1] will address > the "free call option" problem, which I think was first discussed on this > list by Corné Plooy[2] and was later extended

Re: [Lightning-dev] [bitcoin-dev] Taro: A Taproot Asset Representation Overlay

2022-04-11 Thread Dr Maxim Orlovsky via Lightning-dev
https://twitter.com/dr_orlovsky/status/1513555717218873355?s=21=NbHfD-n1NEu8Gdh-dOPifA You do not deserve any other form of answer. On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 5:06 PM, Olaoluwa Osuntokun via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Hi y'all, > > I'm excited to publicly publish a new protocol I've been working on

Re: [Lightning-dev] [bitcoin-dev] [Pre-BIP] Fee Accounts

2022-04-11 Thread Jeremy Rubin
> nonsense marketing I'm sure the people who are confused about "blockchain schemes as \"world computers\" and other nonsense marketing" are avid and regular readers of the bitcoin devs mailing list so I offer my sincerest apologies to all members of the intersection of those sets who were